Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladins in Sunless Citadel (UPDATE)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arravis" data-source="post: 1151810" data-attributes="member: 327"><p>LuYangShih, to put it bluntly, I think this is a debate you've lost.</p><p></p><p>As you point out in D&D alignment isn't subjective, good is good and evil is evil, regardless of your point of view (btw if you go by what's in the PHB alignment descriptions, your vision of a paladin falls into the Lawful Evil category). Anyway, none of the issues I've brought up in this debate deal with subjective alignment in any form. It seems that you want alignments to be extremes where only a few fall on either end of the spectrum and 95% of the populace falls in the neutral category. This just isn't the case in D&D. As was stated by AnthonyJ, alignments in 3rd edition are pretty broad. The bigger definitions of alignment in 3rd edition have nothing to do with subjective alignment, they simply paint with a wider brush. "Evil" is defined as more than simply murdering, raping, etc... a number of lesser offenses also are "evil" by the current rules system. You only seem willing to consider the most extreme crimes as evil and everything else as neutral. What comes across in your posts is a view of good and evil that's more in keeping with 1st edition and not with the current system.</p><p></p><p>As far as "agreeing to disagree", I've done this because I feel I've done all I can without simply repeating the same points over and over. If I had more issues to bring up on this, I would, but I think I've more then successfully defended my views and I'm pleased with the results. Can I convince you of them? Probably not, but the internet is full of all kinds of people and if one tries to convince everyone all the time, it will end only in frustration.</p><p></p><p>Now, if you come up with some new ideas on your arguement, I'll gladly give my opinions on them. Anyway, it's been a good debate overall <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arravis, post: 1151810, member: 327"] LuYangShih, to put it bluntly, I think this is a debate you've lost. As you point out in D&D alignment isn't subjective, good is good and evil is evil, regardless of your point of view (btw if you go by what's in the PHB alignment descriptions, your vision of a paladin falls into the Lawful Evil category). Anyway, none of the issues I've brought up in this debate deal with subjective alignment in any form. It seems that you want alignments to be extremes where only a few fall on either end of the spectrum and 95% of the populace falls in the neutral category. This just isn't the case in D&D. As was stated by AnthonyJ, alignments in 3rd edition are pretty broad. The bigger definitions of alignment in 3rd edition have nothing to do with subjective alignment, they simply paint with a wider brush. "Evil" is defined as more than simply murdering, raping, etc... a number of lesser offenses also are "evil" by the current rules system. You only seem willing to consider the most extreme crimes as evil and everything else as neutral. What comes across in your posts is a view of good and evil that's more in keeping with 1st edition and not with the current system. As far as "agreeing to disagree", I've done this because I feel I've done all I can without simply repeating the same points over and over. If I had more issues to bring up on this, I would, but I think I've more then successfully defended my views and I'm pleased with the results. Can I convince you of them? Probably not, but the internet is full of all kinds of people and if one tries to convince everyone all the time, it will end only in frustration. Now, if you come up with some new ideas on your arguement, I'll gladly give my opinions on them. Anyway, it's been a good debate overall :). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladins in Sunless Citadel (UPDATE)
Top