Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jedi_Solo" data-source="post: 4209981" data-attributes="member: 40245">I don't see a problem with the fix.  Okay... it may have clunky wording but I'm not worried about that.-If there is more than one critter the monsters that aren't marked get to tear into the squishies.-If the monster has ranged attacks it gets to retaliate.-If the monster gets to move/slide/teleport out of the paladin's attack range and/or line-of-sight the tactic is busted.-If the fighter misses on his AoO the tactic is busted.  For this reason we can assume this works best if the fighter can be expected to hit the critter on a regular basis and if the fighter can hit on a regular basis I think it is safe to assume (for the time being) that the paladin would hit with their melee weapon on a regular basis if they chose to do so.-I get the feeling that for most paladin builds this will not be the most effective means of dealing damage.  The paladin will still get to attack with their weapon but I'm guessing in most cases the melee weapon would be the primary while the ranged weapon would be the secondary weapon. So... under a specific set of circumstances the tactic works well.  Under other circumstances it doesn't work so well.  I fail to see the issue here.</blockquote>