Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Giltonio_Santos" data-source="post: 3364353" data-attributes="member: 36874">Although I consider your complains to be legitimate, the 3E way is to balance classes with fairness, and don't let flavor influence that.As a fan of Dark Sun, I cannot say I support this way of thinking; I’m pretty fine with role-play or prerequisite restrictions supporting an above-average class, such as the 2E paladin or defiler wizard.I believe paladins, for instance, could be pushed in power level to justify their roles in the campaign world and their harsh code of conduct, but I don’t believe that would work very well under 3E rules. That’s just not the way they do things nowadays. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Cheers,</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Giltonio_Santos, post: 3364353, member: 36874"] Although I consider your complains to be legitimate, the 3E way is to balance classes with fairness, and don't let flavor influence that. As a fan of Dark Sun, I cannot say I support this way of thinking; I’m pretty fine with role-play or prerequisite restrictions supporting an above-average class, such as the 2E paladin or defiler wizard. I believe paladins, for instance, could be pushed in power level to justify their roles in the campaign world and their harsh code of conduct, but I don’t believe that would work very well under 3E rules. That’s just not the way they do things nowadays. :) Cheers, [/QUOTE]

Verification