Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Palladium's philosophy for D&D 4e? Pros and cons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Donovan Morningfire" data-source="post: 3512939" data-attributes="member: 39532"><p>Ye gods I hope the next (eventual but hopefully not appearing anytime soon) edition of D&D doesn't go the way of Palladium.  I like having a nice consistent set of rules as a common framework, one that can be tweaked if needed, but provides a solid foundation for how the game is run.</p><p></p><p>Palladium has very little of that, if any.  As was said in another thread, Palladium was an "improvement" on the D&D ruleset of the day.  However, I personally see v3.X of D&D as a far better improvement on the basics of D&D, taking into account lessons learned over the years, something Siembieda hasn't done and from the sounds of it won't ever do, becuase he's convinced that he's absolutely right and nobody else has a clue.  If anything, I'd say WotC has one-up'd him in the realm of "generic tool-kit" by means of d20 Modern, which can easily be changed to any type of setting (admittedly some work better than others) <em>and</em> has a consistent rule-set.  Wouldn't be too surprised to learn that a lot of the RIFTS d20 fan supplements use d20 Modern as a baseline, with the OCC/RCCs being Advanced Classes or just separate races.</p><p></p><p>Personally I hope that someone else snags the license for a Robotech RPG, becuase while I'd like to play in that setting, I don't want to have to learn somebody else's house rules to do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Donovan Morningfire, post: 3512939, member: 39532"] Ye gods I hope the next (eventual but hopefully not appearing anytime soon) edition of D&D doesn't go the way of Palladium. I like having a nice consistent set of rules as a common framework, one that can be tweaked if needed, but provides a solid foundation for how the game is run. Palladium has very little of that, if any. As was said in another thread, Palladium was an "improvement" on the D&D ruleset of the day. However, I personally see v3.X of D&D as a far better improvement on the basics of D&D, taking into account lessons learned over the years, something Siembieda hasn't done and from the sounds of it won't ever do, becuase he's convinced that he's absolutely right and nobody else has a clue. If anything, I'd say WotC has one-up'd him in the realm of "generic tool-kit" by means of d20 Modern, which can easily be changed to any type of setting (admittedly some work better than others) [I]and[/I] has a consistent rule-set. Wouldn't be too surprised to learn that a lot of the RIFTS d20 fan supplements use d20 Modern as a baseline, with the OCC/RCCs being Advanced Classes or just separate races. Personally I hope that someone else snags the license for a Robotech RPG, becuase while I'd like to play in that setting, I don't want to have to learn somebody else's house rules to do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Palladium's philosophy for D&D 4e? Pros and cons
Top