Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paper Minions - WT?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4270212" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I won't bother to debate this. But, using movies to justify rules is silly because people can rationalize anything. One person can justify that a rule is bad using the same movie that another person uses to justify that the same rule is good.</p><p></p><p>Rules are good or bad based on what they accomplish with respect to having fun in the game. And the same rule can be good for one game and bad for another.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since the PCs have spell casters and the enemies do not (or only have one or two), it's not hard. A simple Web spell can delay 5 or 6 or more enemies alone. One action by a PC arcane caster delays the enemies by dozens of actions. Crowd control is highly important in these types of conflicts.</p><p></p><p>Note: In our games, even the combatant type PCs tend to have at least some capability to cast spells, use psionics, etc. We tend to not have straight Fighters, but Rangers or Paladins or Psychic Warriors, etc. In our current game, we have a Psychic Warrior, a Monk/Sorcerer, a Sorcerer, a Rogue/Cleric, and a Psion. Every single one of them has non-melee capabiliites (which is not always the case, but often). In this case, 3 of the 5 PCs can cure for example and the rest carry around a lot of potions.</p><p></p><p>The PC melee type can easily be healed by the PC Divine caster who has spontaneous cures and Wands of Curing to back up his spells. The enemy Divine caster (if he exists) typically does not. He often has a few Cure spells, but when he runs out, he runs out.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, if you throw creatures with high DR and/or spell casting (especially arcane spell casting or psionics) and/or special tactics/abilities at the group, you are begging for a TPK.</p><p></p><p>But, an encounter where the enemies have a lot fewer options than the PCs tends to be a slugfest where the PCs have more ways to go to the well. And, these types of encounters tend to be against humanoid type foes, not foes with "tricks" or "defenses".</p><p></p><p>The reason that it is challenging is that there is the chance that things can go terribly wrong for the PCs. For example, most of the enemies could make their saves or one PC could get criticaled by multiple foes in the same round, etc.</p><p></p><p>Also note that this type of thing eats up a lot of party resources, so it tends to be something that can only be handled by the PCs as the first (or possibly second) fight of the day.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, I agree with your assessment here. The 4E minion concept results in a lot of damage. The reason the 3E mooks did not have this same level of damage capability is because PCs did not allow it. The arcane casters cast Greater Invisibility and then did stick and move crowd control or crowd damaging tactics. The divine casters buffed up the AC of the entire team. I do not see this level of player created disparity of capability between PCs and NPCs in 4E, so the NPC minions by defintion will be more capable of chewing up the PCs in 4E.</p><p></p><p>I'm convinced that I will not be able to run 42 NPCs of a few levels lower against the PCs in 4E like I once did in 3E (and remember, I did that particular combat in waves of about 15% of the NPCs per round). PCs in 4E just do not seem to have as many "go to the well charges" as 3E ones (i.e. I consider an At Will power to not be especially "going to the well" in 4E).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4270212, member: 2011"] I won't bother to debate this. But, using movies to justify rules is silly because people can rationalize anything. One person can justify that a rule is bad using the same movie that another person uses to justify that the same rule is good. Rules are good or bad based on what they accomplish with respect to having fun in the game. And the same rule can be good for one game and bad for another. Since the PCs have spell casters and the enemies do not (or only have one or two), it's not hard. A simple Web spell can delay 5 or 6 or more enemies alone. One action by a PC arcane caster delays the enemies by dozens of actions. Crowd control is highly important in these types of conflicts. Note: In our games, even the combatant type PCs tend to have at least some capability to cast spells, use psionics, etc. We tend to not have straight Fighters, but Rangers or Paladins or Psychic Warriors, etc. In our current game, we have a Psychic Warrior, a Monk/Sorcerer, a Sorcerer, a Rogue/Cleric, and a Psion. Every single one of them has non-melee capabiliites (which is not always the case, but often). In this case, 3 of the 5 PCs can cure for example and the rest carry around a lot of potions. The PC melee type can easily be healed by the PC Divine caster who has spontaneous cures and Wands of Curing to back up his spells. The enemy Divine caster (if he exists) typically does not. He often has a few Cure spells, but when he runs out, he runs out. Sure, if you throw creatures with high DR and/or spell casting (especially arcane spell casting or psionics) and/or special tactics/abilities at the group, you are begging for a TPK. But, an encounter where the enemies have a lot fewer options than the PCs tends to be a slugfest where the PCs have more ways to go to the well. And, these types of encounters tend to be against humanoid type foes, not foes with "tricks" or "defenses". The reason that it is challenging is that there is the chance that things can go terribly wrong for the PCs. For example, most of the enemies could make their saves or one PC could get criticaled by multiple foes in the same round, etc. Also note that this type of thing eats up a lot of party resources, so it tends to be something that can only be handled by the PCs as the first (or possibly second) fight of the day. Oh, I agree with your assessment here. The 4E minion concept results in a lot of damage. The reason the 3E mooks did not have this same level of damage capability is because PCs did not allow it. The arcane casters cast Greater Invisibility and then did stick and move crowd control or crowd damaging tactics. The divine casters buffed up the AC of the entire team. I do not see this level of player created disparity of capability between PCs and NPCs in 4E, so the NPC minions by defintion will be more capable of chewing up the PCs in 4E. I'm convinced that I will not be able to run 42 NPCs of a few levels lower against the PCs in 4E like I once did in 3E (and remember, I did that particular combat in waves of about 15% of the NPCs per round). PCs in 4E just do not seem to have as many "go to the well charges" as 3E ones (i.e. I consider an At Will power to not be especially "going to the well" in 4E). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paper Minions - WT?
Top