Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
Parrying Weapons & Duelist subclass.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Doskious" data-source="post: 8490993" data-attributes="member: 86490"><p>I posted an analysis of this on Morrus' discord...</p><p></p><p>As presently written, suppose I'm a 15th level Duelist dual-wielding Scimitars (which effectively have the parrying property thanks to <em>Parry and Thrust</em>), and that I have the Parrying Counter combat maneuver.</p><p></p><p>Under RAW, I can:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Use my reaction at the end of my turn to, for 0* exertion, activate Parrying Counter against That Opponent (a creature I can see), for at minimum a d6 expertise die to my AC against them.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">with the scimitar in my left hand, once before my next turn gain an expertise die (d4) to my AC against a single melee attack made against me by a creature I can see.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">with the scimitar in my right hand, once before my next turn gain an expertise die (d4) to my AC against a single melee attack made against me by a creature I can see.</li> </ol><p>* assuming I still have <em>Panache</em> uses left</p><p></p><p>Then, supposing that That Opponent makes a single melee attack against me, it would seem that the attack might be at:</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">[my AC] + 3 + 2 + 2 = [my AC] + 7 (range: 3 - 14 on a bell curve)</p><p>and that if That Opponent's attack misses, I would be entitled to:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">a melee weapon attack against it (from Parrying Counter)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">a melee weapon attack against it at the cost of 1 exertion (from <em>Parry and Thrust</em>)</li> </ol><p>Supposing that That Opponent makes two melee attacks against me and I used the parrying property on my two scimitars independently, one against each attack, it would be at:</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">[my AC] + 5 (range: 2 - 10 on a bell curve)</p><p>and I would be entitled to, if both attacks missed, three melee weapon attacks against it at the aggregate cost of 2 exertion.</p><p></p><p>Note that I am not factoring in the usual Expertise Die scaling effect <strong>intentionally</strong>.</p><p></p><p>The rules regarding the scaling of expertise dice are very clearly only expressed in the context of rolls with which you have gained expertise dice. Your AC is not a rolled value. Therefore, rules-as-written, the (almost certainly intended-to-apply-in-this-case-too) scaling of expertise dice does not apply, as the expertise dice are not modifying a <em>rolled</em> value.</p><p></p><p>Now, I'm ... almost certain ... that it's not the intent of the abilities to potentially add (assuming that there is some mechanism by which the Parrying Counter expertise die can be bumped up to a d12 through synergistic bardic effects, and that the maximum value is obtained from all rolled dice used to modify AC against a single attack) 20 to a very lucky and well-coordinated duelist's AC.</p><p></p><p>I say "almost certain" because the degree of both coordination and luck that would need to transpire to bump AC by 20 using this combination of gambits strikes me as the kind of thing that would make for an exceptionally compelling narrative scene where the Human Duelist wielding two regular scimitars parries a Gundam wielding a blade the size of the Chrysler building (after which the Duelist gets three free attacks).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Doskious, post: 8490993, member: 86490"] I posted an analysis of this on Morrus' discord... As presently written, suppose I'm a 15th level Duelist dual-wielding Scimitars (which effectively have the parrying property thanks to [I]Parry and Thrust[/I]), and that I have the Parrying Counter combat maneuver. Under RAW, I can: [LIST=1] [*]Use my reaction at the end of my turn to, for 0* exertion, activate Parrying Counter against That Opponent (a creature I can see), for at minimum a d6 expertise die to my AC against them. [*]with the scimitar in my left hand, once before my next turn gain an expertise die (d4) to my AC against a single melee attack made against me by a creature I can see. [*]with the scimitar in my right hand, once before my next turn gain an expertise die (d4) to my AC against a single melee attack made against me by a creature I can see. [/LIST] * assuming I still have [I]Panache[/I] uses left Then, supposing that That Opponent makes a single melee attack against me, it would seem that the attack might be at: [INDENT][my AC] + 3 + 2 + 2 = [my AC] + 7 (range: 3 - 14 on a bell curve)[/INDENT] and that if That Opponent's attack misses, I would be entitled to: [LIST=1] [*]a melee weapon attack against it (from Parrying Counter) [*]a melee weapon attack against it at the cost of 1 exertion (from [I]Parry and Thrust[/I]) [/LIST] Supposing that That Opponent makes two melee attacks against me and I used the parrying property on my two scimitars independently, one against each attack, it would be at: [INDENT][my AC] + 5 (range: 2 - 10 on a bell curve)[/INDENT] and I would be entitled to, if both attacks missed, three melee weapon attacks against it at the aggregate cost of 2 exertion. Note that I am not factoring in the usual Expertise Die scaling effect [B]intentionally[/B]. The rules regarding the scaling of expertise dice are very clearly only expressed in the context of rolls with which you have gained expertise dice. Your AC is not a rolled value. Therefore, rules-as-written, the (almost certainly intended-to-apply-in-this-case-too) scaling of expertise dice does not apply, as the expertise dice are not modifying a [I]rolled[/I] value. Now, I'm ... almost certain ... that it's not the intent of the abilities to potentially add (assuming that there is some mechanism by which the Parrying Counter expertise die can be bumped up to a d12 through synergistic bardic effects, and that the maximum value is obtained from all rolled dice used to modify AC against a single attack) 20 to a very lucky and well-coordinated duelist's AC. I say "almost certain" because the degree of both coordination and luck that would need to transpire to bump AC by 20 using this combination of gambits strikes me as the kind of thing that would make for an exceptionally compelling narrative scene where the Human Duelist wielding two regular scimitars parries a Gundam wielding a blade the size of the Chrysler building (after which the Duelist gets three free attacks). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
Parrying Weapons & Duelist subclass.
Top