Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doskious" data-source="post: 8492091" data-attributes="member: 86490">I don't disagree with you.I'm on record in several places with the stated intent to run my games a particular way that is in largely line with your suggestions. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />I don't need convincing, and I don't think that I have a problem that remains in need of a solution about this topic for my own personal purposes.That said, I've played with enough different people to know that there are some, with whom I've enjoyed playing, for whom the hair-splitting interpretations of the rules is part of the fun. It is with those people in mind that I have continued to comment, because reading between the lines (while something I view as basically required for situations like these) is not an activity that is universally accepted, and this (the degree and manner in which a Narrator is planning to read between the lines) is one of the things that would be ideal to come up in a Session 0 discussion.I would hope that Session 0 discussions would, some of them, draw on conversations like these to identify content in need of discussion, and that is why I replied (with a notable lack of exposition detailing my motives to be sure <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doskious, post: 8492091, member: 86490"] I don't disagree with you. I'm on record in several places with the stated intent to run my games a particular way that is in largely line with your suggestions. :D I don't need convincing, and I don't think that I have a problem that remains in need of a solution about this topic for my own personal purposes. That said, I've played with enough different people to know that there are some, with whom I've enjoyed playing, for whom the hair-splitting interpretations of the rules is [I]part of the fun[/I]. It is with those people in mind that I have continued to comment, because reading between the lines (while something I view as basically required for situations like these) is not an activity that is universally accepted, and this (the degree and manner in which a Narrator is planning to read between the lines) is one of the things that would be ideal to come up in a Session 0 discussion. I would hope that Session 0 discussions would, some of them, draw on conversations like these to identify content in need of discussion, and that is why I replied (with a notable lack of exposition detailing my motives to be sure ;) ). [/QUOTE]

Verification