Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Party AC difference
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mkill" data-source="post: 5122468" data-attributes="member: 55985"><p>This poll is missing the point. The question is not what AC the other party members have, but what attack bonus the monsters have that you fight.</p><p></p><p>The game is balanced around the idea that the standard monster hits the standard non-defender PC of the same level with a chance of 50%.</p><p></p><p>If you look at the monster creation guidelines, this sets average AC for all PCs at 15+level. This value more or less holds true from level 1 to 30. Everything above that is good AC, anything below that is bad AC.</p><p></p><p>Example: The group I DM'ed had a 10th-level sorcerer with AC 19. Even worse, that guy had no sense for personal security and always tried to attack stuff with Sorcerous Blade Channeling in melee. Level 10 monsters could roll ridiculously low and still hit him. The PC was always bloodied in one or two rounds, and it's a fricking miracle (and graciousness on the DM side) that he only went down once.</p><p></p><p>The 10th-level Genasi Swordmage in the same group had AC 28, which is standard defender AC for that level. It's not that the AC span between him and the sorcerer was too wide, the sorcerer's AC was just ridiculously bad.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 1: The DM can adjust standard monster level up or down one or two depending on how well-optimized the party is. But this means monster damage, defenses and general nastiness also go up or down. It's not possible to only raise or lower monster attack ratings for one character whose AC is off the charts up or down.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 2: Some classes have innate defensive abilities that are calculated in. I'm talking about the Warlock's Shadow Walk etc.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 3: Monster melee attacks target AC more often, while monster ranged attacks target NADs more often. That is why AC is somewhat more important for melee characters, while ranged combatants can focus on NADs.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 4: Defenders are expected to invite monster attacks, but shake them off more easily. That is why their AC should be better than average, but not at unhittable levels. The sweet spot is between 16+level and 20+level.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 5: AC is not the only important figure in survivability. Also consider NADs, the ability to generate temp hp, better/more saves, self-healing, concealment/invisibility etc.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 6: Strikers are a magnet for monster attacks. Striker AC can never be high enough.</p><p></p><p>Caveat 7: When you consider raising AC, remember that everything has an opportunity cost. The feats, powers and magic items you spend on raising your AC cannot be spend on offense, mobility, and other defenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mkill, post: 5122468, member: 55985"] This poll is missing the point. The question is not what AC the other party members have, but what attack bonus the monsters have that you fight. The game is balanced around the idea that the standard monster hits the standard non-defender PC of the same level with a chance of 50%. If you look at the monster creation guidelines, this sets average AC for all PCs at 15+level. This value more or less holds true from level 1 to 30. Everything above that is good AC, anything below that is bad AC. Example: The group I DM'ed had a 10th-level sorcerer with AC 19. Even worse, that guy had no sense for personal security and always tried to attack stuff with Sorcerous Blade Channeling in melee. Level 10 monsters could roll ridiculously low and still hit him. The PC was always bloodied in one or two rounds, and it's a fricking miracle (and graciousness on the DM side) that he only went down once. The 10th-level Genasi Swordmage in the same group had AC 28, which is standard defender AC for that level. It's not that the AC span between him and the sorcerer was too wide, the sorcerer's AC was just ridiculously bad. Caveat 1: The DM can adjust standard monster level up or down one or two depending on how well-optimized the party is. But this means monster damage, defenses and general nastiness also go up or down. It's not possible to only raise or lower monster attack ratings for one character whose AC is off the charts up or down. Caveat 2: Some classes have innate defensive abilities that are calculated in. I'm talking about the Warlock's Shadow Walk etc. Caveat 3: Monster melee attacks target AC more often, while monster ranged attacks target NADs more often. That is why AC is somewhat more important for melee characters, while ranged combatants can focus on NADs. Caveat 4: Defenders are expected to invite monster attacks, but shake them off more easily. That is why their AC should be better than average, but not at unhittable levels. The sweet spot is between 16+level and 20+level. Caveat 5: AC is not the only important figure in survivability. Also consider NADs, the ability to generate temp hp, better/more saves, self-healing, concealment/invisibility etc. Caveat 6: Strikers are a magnet for monster attacks. Striker AC can never be high enough. Caveat 7: When you consider raising AC, remember that everything has an opportunity cost. The feats, powers and magic items you spend on raising your AC cannot be spend on offense, mobility, and other defenses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Party AC difference
Top