Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Passive Checks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HarbingerX" data-source="post: 4742525" data-attributes="member: 53951"><p>Take 10 is a 3.0 rule. I'll leave it up to the many previous threads to explain why Take 10 was 'un-fun' and removed.</p><p></p><p>Passive checks are really just that - passive. A player doesn't instigate them. </p><p></p><p>After carefully reading through the books, reading the forums, and giving it some thought, for me it boils down to this:</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>If the players ask want to perform an action, ask yourself 'is this something at which they might fail?' </strong></li> </ul> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <ul style="margin-left: 20px"> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If it is, then set the DC and let them roll. Failure is failure, no matter what their passive values might be.</li> </ul> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <ul style="margin-left: 20px"> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If it isn't, then just let them succeed.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>If the players to have a chance to notice something automatically.</strong><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">See if their passive DC is high enough to give them the information.</li> </ul> </li> </ul><p>So a roll for Perception for example, should always be to find something that they wouldn't have noticed anyway.</p><p></p><p>I keep a list of my player's passive scores handy and use that to let them know who notices things. They're not so good at noticing stuff now that their Wizard died and was replaced with a Barbarian....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HarbingerX, post: 4742525, member: 53951"] Take 10 is a 3.0 rule. I'll leave it up to the many previous threads to explain why Take 10 was 'un-fun' and removed. Passive checks are really just that - passive. A player doesn't instigate them. After carefully reading through the books, reading the forums, and giving it some thought, for me it boils down to this: [LIST] [*][B]If the players ask want to perform an action, ask yourself 'is this something at which they might fail?' [/B] [/LIST] [INDENT] [LIST] [*]If it is, then set the DC and let them roll. Failure is failure, no matter what their passive values might be. [/LIST] [/INDENT][INDENT] [LIST] [*]If it isn't, then just let them succeed. [/LIST] [/INDENT] [LIST] [*][B]If the players to have a chance to notice something automatically.[/B] [LIST] [*]See if their passive DC is high enough to give them the information. [/LIST] [/LIST] So a roll for Perception for example, should always be to find something that they wouldn't have noticed anyway. I keep a list of my player's passive scores handy and use that to let them know who notices things. They're not so good at noticing stuff now that their Wizard died and was replaced with a Barbarian.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Passive Checks
Top