Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Path of Feats: a Superior Design than Subclasses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silam" data-source="post: 9888592" data-attributes="member: 7055898"><p>I hear you… but the issues you describe are exactly the ones I have with the class system…</p><p></p><p>Each level of a class is a "unit of progress" which has the prereq of possessing the previous level of the class. Subclasses make this slightly more complex but ultimately it’s still mostly the same.</p><p></p><p>If we consider just the classes and ignore the subclasses, that’s 12 x 20 = 240 atomic units of progress, all but 12 of which (the 1st levels) are free of prepreqs (and even the 1st levels are not totally free of prereqs since you need 13 in one or two stats to have them in a multiclass build).</p><p></p><p>If I’m interested in one of those atomic units of progress, I need every single prereq (i.e., previous levels of that class), to get it.</p><p></p><p>Now if we reintroduce the subclasses we left aside so far, the complexity is even greater, because there are about 20% of these 240 units of progress that are not actually a single thing, but rather one of 4 different options, with their own extra prereqs (e.g., Illusionist 6 requires Illusionist 3, in addition to requiring Wizard 5).</p><p></p><p>Those 240 class levels + 200-ish subclass levels are spread across >100 pages. Furthermore, all that stuff includes a fair bit of redundant info (i.e., how much boilerplate is there with all the spellcasting class features that are almost identical except very slight tweaks, and all the Extra Attack, and Weapon Mastery, and Fighting Style, etc which are redundant across classes?)…</p><p></p><p>To call this simpler is an opinion, and as far as opinions go it’s legitimate. But it’s not necessarily a fact that it’s actually simpler. Maybe if you just pick one of the 48 subclasses randomly and build a single class character with it, then yeah, it’s simple. But compared to reading a list of feats and working out the prereqs, it’s hard to make the case that reading a list of class features and trying to fit them into a build is actually simpler.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silam, post: 9888592, member: 7055898"] I hear you… but the issues you describe are exactly the ones I have with the class system… Each level of a class is a "unit of progress" which has the prereq of possessing the previous level of the class. Subclasses make this slightly more complex but ultimately it’s still mostly the same. If we consider just the classes and ignore the subclasses, that’s 12 x 20 = 240 atomic units of progress, all but 12 of which (the 1st levels) are free of prepreqs (and even the 1st levels are not totally free of prereqs since you need 13 in one or two stats to have them in a multiclass build). If I’m interested in one of those atomic units of progress, I need every single prereq (i.e., previous levels of that class), to get it. Now if we reintroduce the subclasses we left aside so far, the complexity is even greater, because there are about 20% of these 240 units of progress that are not actually a single thing, but rather one of 4 different options, with their own extra prereqs (e.g., Illusionist 6 requires Illusionist 3, in addition to requiring Wizard 5). Those 240 class levels + 200-ish subclass levels are spread across >100 pages. Furthermore, all that stuff includes a fair bit of redundant info (i.e., how much boilerplate is there with all the spellcasting class features that are almost identical except very slight tweaks, and all the Extra Attack, and Weapon Mastery, and Fighting Style, etc which are redundant across classes?)… To call this simpler is an opinion, and as far as opinions go it’s legitimate. But it’s not necessarily a fact that it’s actually simpler. Maybe if you just pick one of the 48 subclasses randomly and build a single class character with it, then yeah, it’s simple. But compared to reading a list of feats and working out the prereqs, it’s hard to make the case that reading a list of class features and trying to fit them into a build is actually simpler. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Path of Feats: a Superior Design than Subclasses
Top