Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 8239724" data-attributes="member: 6778210">It's not about them liking or disliking something. It's that it is constantly, unendingly brought up. I have my problems with 5E, but I don't go over there and just constantly systemcrap on it because I don't find that to be productive or helpful. This is less complaining and coming closer to picking fights.I don't like 5E crafting, too, but I moved on to positive things rather than constantly harp on what I don't like. And if someone bounces off PF2, I'm okay with suggesting other options so that they find something they are happy with: it's why I suggested Spheres of Power & Spheres of Might in another thread.I've seen Cap elsewhere; they even sold me on an RPG system before. But this style of posting is just unendingly frustrating. Perhaps if this board had the same amount of traffic as the D&D board I could toss it away, but obviously that is not the case.Yeah, it's an interesting workaround. I kind of wish Fighters got that as well; make <a href="https://2e.aonprd.com/Feats.aspx?ID=1721" target="_blank">Combat Assessment</a> a requirement if there needs to be a balance or something.I do think this is an instance where the GM has a lot of leeway in what they hand out, which means the skill can have very different impacts depending on what kind of GM you have. On one level I get why they don't want someone to be able to pinpoint target what a weakness is (or at least why it's a feat for some), but at the same time I do agree that it's such a broad-reaching skill that it's something where you could put in some examples of what sort of success might be required to figure something out or not.</blockquote>

Verification