Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2 and the game Paizo should have made
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7814769" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Instead of trying talk in the two active threads at once, let me say it here instead! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p><em>Disclaimer and trigger warning: I have strong opinions on the various D&D editions. Discussing PF2 becomes watered down and meaningless if I can't say what I really think. So let me state right off the bat that if you like monsters in 5E, class balance in Pathfinder or much of anything in 4E I would ask you to please find a different thread. Or at least keep in mind that an attack on your favorite game or mechanism is not an attack on you. Thank you. </em> </p><p></p><p>My core irk with Pathfinder 2 is - who was this game made for?</p><p></p><p>It clearly improves upon 5E in many regards. Chiefly monsters and encounters are revitalized and again dangerous and exciting. And of course it clearly intends to offer much more choice for players. Robust support for a magic item economy (as opposed to how gold is worthless in 5E). Like 5E (and very much unlike 3E) it tries to make life easier by not forcing Dungeon/Game Masters create monsters using PC rules, and it also attempts to balance martial and spellcasting classes.</p><p></p><p>In other regards it comes across as completely clueless of 5E's success or even existence. It is very rules heavy. I do not think anyone would say I am unfair if I characterize it as "a wall of feats". It gorges itself on the littlest +1's and -1's. There are literally dozens of conditions. In other words, it utterly lacks 5E's newbie friendliness (no matter how much its defenders try telling you everything is "organized"; the game still is way crunchier than anyone needed or wanted).</p><p></p><p>So the legions of new ttrpg recruits will likely not be able to handle PF2, or even want to.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, it is 100% incompatible with Pathfinder 1. You simply cannot recreate the same characters - class abilities, feats and even numbers are entirely different. (Obviously, that there isn't yet support for a gazillion prestige classes is not a dig against the system). </p><p></p><p>And the thing about player choices... well, it turns out much of it is is just window-dressing, I'm afraid. Chargen is curiously inflexible, yet very fiddly. You can't impact the fundamentals - your attack bonus, AC and saves are locked in by your level 1 choice of class. Yet you are asked to a swim in a sea of feat choices.</p><p></p><p>Most (though not all) feats change very little about your character, and thus is of no help anchoring your characterization or portrayal. In short, you're asked to make choices which ultimately doesn't change anything; they just shifting the numbers to where they should have been in the first place. One way of this is to call it "balanced" and "you can't make a wrong choice". Another is "your choices don't matter". </p><p></p><p>Finally, in some regards it doubles down on the things we stopped playing 4E for. To some extent WotC is also guilty of this. It is easy to spam backgrounds and subclasses that mostly just rearrange the same old class abilities around. You can put an intern on the job; no real dev experience needed. But mostly I would have hoped it was a bad memory from the 4E era. Not so - this obnoxious design philosophy is alive and well in PF2.</p><p></p><p>Do you really need to put a name on each every combination of two feats? Not to mention how instead of having one feat that says "you can use your good skill for this action" Pathfinder 2 clearly intends to have individual feats for each and every skill-action combo. What this is? Spam. Nothing more, nothing less. It's like eating diet candy bars instead of the real thing: actual new rules crunch with new rules mechanisms.</p><p></p><p>Same with magic items, which are way too similar to the bland and boring magic item design of 4E. 3E and 5E does magic items right - both editions sport magic items that really have impact, the way magic should work. In PF2 probably the worst example would be Talismans, which are among the most petty and miserly item designs I have ever seen: for a far too high cost and much too much prep you get the tiniest bonus for the shortest time possible. Just blergh.</p><p></p><p>So, who was this game made for?</p><p></p><p>As far as I can see, it was made for... dunno? People that like restricted and fiddly characters with verbose names for the littlest things, 4E style, but with d20 variety in monsters...? Pathfinder and 3E holdouts that finally get to break LFQW (Linear Fighter Quadratic Wizard)...? But if you still play those games, you are likely not bothered by how multiclassed spellcasters rule the world! And what do the huge 5E crowds get? Not.... much of anything at all? </p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>I for one cannot fathom why Paizo did not create a game that caters to 5E sensibilities but "gives more". More player-side charbuild crunch. Better monster support for the DM. </p><p></p><p>But a game that is fundamentally more like easy 5E than byzantine d20. And certainly a game that actually tries hard to NOT look like 4E.</p><p></p><p>Why, Paizo. Why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7814769, member: 12731"] Instead of trying talk in the two active threads at once, let me say it here instead! :) [i]Disclaimer and trigger warning: I have strong opinions on the various D&D editions. Discussing PF2 becomes watered down and meaningless if I can't say what I really think. So let me state right off the bat that if you like monsters in 5E, class balance in Pathfinder or much of anything in 4E I would ask you to please find a different thread. Or at least keep in mind that an attack on your favorite game or mechanism is not an attack on you. Thank you. [/i] My core irk with Pathfinder 2 is - who was this game made for? It clearly improves upon 5E in many regards. Chiefly monsters and encounters are revitalized and again dangerous and exciting. And of course it clearly intends to offer much more choice for players. Robust support for a magic item economy (as opposed to how gold is worthless in 5E). Like 5E (and very much unlike 3E) it tries to make life easier by not forcing Dungeon/Game Masters create monsters using PC rules, and it also attempts to balance martial and spellcasting classes. In other regards it comes across as completely clueless of 5E's success or even existence. It is very rules heavy. I do not think anyone would say I am unfair if I characterize it as "a wall of feats". It gorges itself on the littlest +1's and -1's. There are literally dozens of conditions. In other words, it utterly lacks 5E's newbie friendliness (no matter how much its defenders try telling you everything is "organized"; the game still is way crunchier than anyone needed or wanted). So the legions of new ttrpg recruits will likely not be able to handle PF2, or even want to. At the same time, it is 100% incompatible with Pathfinder 1. You simply cannot recreate the same characters - class abilities, feats and even numbers are entirely different. (Obviously, that there isn't yet support for a gazillion prestige classes is not a dig against the system). And the thing about player choices... well, it turns out much of it is is just window-dressing, I'm afraid. Chargen is curiously inflexible, yet very fiddly. You can't impact the fundamentals - your attack bonus, AC and saves are locked in by your level 1 choice of class. Yet you are asked to a swim in a sea of feat choices. Most (though not all) feats change very little about your character, and thus is of no help anchoring your characterization or portrayal. In short, you're asked to make choices which ultimately doesn't change anything; they just shifting the numbers to where they should have been in the first place. One way of this is to call it "balanced" and "you can't make a wrong choice". Another is "your choices don't matter". Finally, in some regards it doubles down on the things we stopped playing 4E for. To some extent WotC is also guilty of this. It is easy to spam backgrounds and subclasses that mostly just rearrange the same old class abilities around. You can put an intern on the job; no real dev experience needed. But mostly I would have hoped it was a bad memory from the 4E era. Not so - this obnoxious design philosophy is alive and well in PF2. Do you really need to put a name on each every combination of two feats? Not to mention how instead of having one feat that says "you can use your good skill for this action" Pathfinder 2 clearly intends to have individual feats for each and every skill-action combo. What this is? Spam. Nothing more, nothing less. It's like eating diet candy bars instead of the real thing: actual new rules crunch with new rules mechanisms. Same with magic items, which are way too similar to the bland and boring magic item design of 4E. 3E and 5E does magic items right - both editions sport magic items that really have impact, the way magic should work. In PF2 probably the worst example would be Talismans, which are among the most petty and miserly item designs I have ever seen: for a far too high cost and much too much prep you get the tiniest bonus for the shortest time possible. Just blergh. So, who was this game made for? As far as I can see, it was made for... dunno? People that like restricted and fiddly characters with verbose names for the littlest things, 4E style, but with d20 variety in monsters...? Pathfinder and 3E holdouts that finally get to break LFQW (Linear Fighter Quadratic Wizard)...? But if you still play those games, you are likely not bothered by how multiclassed spellcasters rule the world! And what do the huge 5E crowds get? Not.... much of anything at all? --- I for one cannot fathom why Paizo did not create a game that caters to 5E sensibilities but "gives more". More player-side charbuild crunch. Better monster support for the DM. But a game that is fundamentally more like easy 5E than byzantine d20. And certainly a game that actually tries hard to NOT look like 4E. Why, Paizo. Why? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2 and the game Paizo should have made
Top