Menu
Home
Post new thread
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Find Us!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
EN Live
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Biggest TTRPG Kickstarter Creators
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Chat/Discord
Podcast
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE!
X Marks the Spot: Piratical Resources for your 5E game
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2 and the two dichotomies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8241061" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>It is definitely a criticism of the AP, and not inherent to the system.</p><p></p><p>To some extent, at least. There are still elements that makes PF2 feel much more restricted and un-generous than 5E in my opinion that come from the system and not just some writers guidelines.</p><p></p><p>That is, on one hand, yes encounter balance (and varying it) is an art, a delicate thing.</p><p></p><p>But on the other, PF2 and 5E still approaches this fundamentally differently. 5E is easy (maybe too easy), while PF2 is hard (maybe too hard). In 5E, bonuses like magic items and spell buffs feel generous; they are powerful and fun rewards (just not so over the top as 3E/PF1 effects were). PF2 in comparison comes across as only very reluctantly handing things out, always trying to claim you got a reward but not really giving anything substantial to you, if you see what I mean. Magic items are obligations, not rewards, in PF2. You need them, you are expected to have them. There is little joy in them, since every monster is balanced against you having them, so the main impact is when you <em>don't</em> have them - then you feel punished.</p><p></p><p>These things are on the system as opposed to just decisions made by individual scenario writers.</p><p></p><p>PS. I should add that over the course of twently levels the tables slowly turn in PF2. (At least I think this is because systemic design decisions and not just scenario writer decisions) At low level you are outclassed by a monster of your own level. At high level you outclass a monster of your own level. At the very top levels (at least 15) the game does start to feel a little bit more like "proper D&D", in that you no longer so very desperately need every magic item and buff, and that the adventure needs to go above and beyond the baseline to challenge you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 8241061, member: 12731"] It is definitely a criticism of the AP, and not inherent to the system. To some extent, at least. There are still elements that makes PF2 feel much more restricted and un-generous than 5E in my opinion that come from the system and not just some writers guidelines. That is, on one hand, yes encounter balance (and varying it) is an art, a delicate thing. But on the other, PF2 and 5E still approaches this fundamentally differently. 5E is easy (maybe too easy), while PF2 is hard (maybe too hard). In 5E, bonuses like magic items and spell buffs feel generous; they are powerful and fun rewards (just not so over the top as 3E/PF1 effects were). PF2 in comparison comes across as only very reluctantly handing things out, always trying to claim you got a reward but not really giving anything substantial to you, if you see what I mean. Magic items are obligations, not rewards, in PF2. You need them, you are expected to have them. There is little joy in them, since every monster is balanced against you having them, so the main impact is when you [I]don't[/I] have them - then you feel punished. These things are on the system as opposed to just decisions made by individual scenario writers. PS. I should add that over the course of twently levels the tables slowly turn in PF2. (At least I think this is because systemic design decisions and not just scenario writer decisions) At low level you are outclassed by a monster of your own level. At high level you outclass a monster of your own level. At the very top levels (at least 15) the game does start to feel a little bit more like "proper D&D", in that you no longer so very desperately need every magic item and buff, and that the adventure needs to go above and beyond the baseline to challenge you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2 and the two dichotomies
Top