Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 7482433" data-attributes="member: 29398">OK, that seems marginally better...but still pretty weak.I hope there's other ways provided of detecting magic that are considerably more precise, such that a caster can find the one magic gem in a bag of 25 otherwise-identical gems without having to put the gems 31' apart from each other and casting this 25 times...&nbsp; Same goes for a treasure hoard - a suit of plate mail, a shield, a helmet, a longsword, a shortsword, a quiver of arrows, a bow, a vial, a rolled-up piece of parchment, a ring, an amulet, three gems, a bracelet, a golden cup, a statuette; all masterwork and there's magic in there somewhere.&nbsp; The higher-level versions can narrow it down a bit but are still kinda pointless, leavning no real alternative but to scoop up absolutely everything you find and sort it out once back in town.The usefulness and value of Bags of Holding just went up big time.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 7482433, member: 29398"] OK, that seems marginally better...but still pretty weak. I hope there's other ways provided of detecting magic that are considerably more precise, such that a caster can find the one magic gem in a bag of 25 otherwise-identical gems without having to put the gems 31' apart from each other and casting this 25 times... Same goes for a treasure hoard - a suit of plate mail, a shield, a helmet, a longsword, a shortsword, a quiver of arrows, a bow, a vial, a rolled-up piece of parchment, a ring, an amulet, three gems, a bracelet, a golden cup, a statuette; all masterwork and there's magic in there somewhere. The higher-level versions can narrow it down a bit but are still kinda pointless, leavning no real alternative but to scoop up absolutely everything you find and sort it out once back in town. The usefulness and value of Bags of Holding just went up big time. [/QUOTE]

Verification