Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2e: Actual Play Experience
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 7998294" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>I haven't found combats to be quick in any edition of D&D/PF including 5E or PF2. Fast combats really depend on the players. My players tend to overthink everything. Sometimes I sit as the DM as they overthink the combat thinking "Why didn't you have your action planned before it reached your turn?" Slow player information processing slows the game down more than the rules. As a DM I will gloss over a rule or forget a round or two and not worry about it to keep the game flowing. Oh well, combat is combat, sometimes people forget things even in real life. So it fits it would happen in game. Just keep going and get the combat done. </p><p></p><p>PF2 combats take a while like past editions. And players are still often the slowest part. And the fact I tend to run combats in a coordinated fashion once the players set off a series of events in a given area that brings everyone running. I don't like to run encounters as single encounters unless it fits like a party taking on a dragon alone in a cave or wandering one encounter a day exploration encounters. My combats are usually big multi-room encounters with 10 to 15 varied challenge monsters taking individual actions on different initiatives closing in on the PCs from multiple areas in an encounter area. That is never going to run fast no matter the edition. It didn't run fast in 5E or 3E or PF1 or PF 2.</p><p></p><p>The main difference for me is on the back end, not in the game play. I knew the Pf1 rules very well. I could run combats very quickly. But on the back end it took me far more time to set up encounters in PF1 than it does in PF2 and 5E. Which lowers the overall time I spend on encounters as a DM. The actual in game combats run about the same amount of time and hopefully will improve as I commit more of the PF2 rules to memory. But the back end of PF2 has been substantially lower because I've been able to run monsters and NPCs as written in the Bestiary and monster books without modification. And buffing and spell strategy does not require as intense preparation as it did in PF1/3E. It's about as complex to build and run encounters as 5E from a DM perspective with better balanced monsters out of the book for players using feats, multiclassing, and magic items.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 7998294, member: 5834"] I haven't found combats to be quick in any edition of D&D/PF including 5E or PF2. Fast combats really depend on the players. My players tend to overthink everything. Sometimes I sit as the DM as they overthink the combat thinking "Why didn't you have your action planned before it reached your turn?" Slow player information processing slows the game down more than the rules. As a DM I will gloss over a rule or forget a round or two and not worry about it to keep the game flowing. Oh well, combat is combat, sometimes people forget things even in real life. So it fits it would happen in game. Just keep going and get the combat done. PF2 combats take a while like past editions. And players are still often the slowest part. And the fact I tend to run combats in a coordinated fashion once the players set off a series of events in a given area that brings everyone running. I don't like to run encounters as single encounters unless it fits like a party taking on a dragon alone in a cave or wandering one encounter a day exploration encounters. My combats are usually big multi-room encounters with 10 to 15 varied challenge monsters taking individual actions on different initiatives closing in on the PCs from multiple areas in an encounter area. That is never going to run fast no matter the edition. It didn't run fast in 5E or 3E or PF1 or PF 2. The main difference for me is on the back end, not in the game play. I knew the Pf1 rules very well. I could run combats very quickly. But on the back end it took me far more time to set up encounters in PF1 than it does in PF2 and 5E. Which lowers the overall time I spend on encounters as a DM. The actual in game combats run about the same amount of time and hopefully will improve as I commit more of the PF2 rules to memory. But the back end of PF2 has been substantially lower because I've been able to run monsters and NPCs as written in the Bestiary and monster books without modification. And buffing and spell strategy does not require as intense preparation as it did in PF1/3E. It's about as complex to build and run encounters as 5E from a DM perspective with better balanced monsters out of the book for players using feats, multiclassing, and magic items. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2e: Actual Play Experience
Top