Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8425903" data-attributes="member: 12731">How can we ever criticize any ruleset if we are required to add a layer of Shey common sense first?Since the rules do not accommodate or recognize the notion that "yes you paid for that feat, but you shouldn't bitch when I talk myself into it at the table for free", why aren't I allowed to point to the inhibiting consequence as a drawback of the system?Especially since so many other games give you D&Dish goodness without this ever being such a prevalent problem?The core issue I see with PF2, after all, is how Paizo again and again chooses the needlessly complicated - and complicating - approach to every little rule.For no apparent benefit as far as I can see, except creating a void for splat books they can then fill.</blockquote>