Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Acolyte of Zothique" data-source="post: 7816806" data-attributes="member: 6852701"><p>Your first comment 'popularity does not equate to quality'. Let me turn that around.</p><p></p><p>5e edition, while not the end all and be all of D&D style games, is the first to have undergone extensive public playtesting and to have inputs from a variety of different people in the RPG industry. It's also the first edition of D&D to have been in print 5+ years - since AD&D2E - with the PHB still proving a bestseller and all the 5e books still in print. In my personal experience, I've had many new players enjoy the game to the extent they have gone off to play in other 5e games or become DMs themselves. I would strongly argue none of this would have happened if 5E was not a quality game which appeals to a majority. In our social media saturated world poor quality would have killed 5e by now. That quality has also been a factor in it's popularity and enduring appeal. Quality does equate to popularity, the game's commercial success is an objectively incontrovertible measure of this. You don't like 5e? Fine. I don't like Earl Grey tea. You can't please all of the people all the time.</p><p></p><p>Your views are as valid as anyone elses. I have never argued that they are not. However, they come across as an inflammatory attack on 5e due to the language used - edition warring. So what is the point of that language? Your view appears to be you hate 5e. It's valid but it antagonises people who like 5e. So is that viewpoint really worth expressing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Acolyte of Zothique, post: 7816806, member: 6852701"] Your first comment 'popularity does not equate to quality'. Let me turn that around. 5e edition, while not the end all and be all of D&D style games, is the first to have undergone extensive public playtesting and to have inputs from a variety of different people in the RPG industry. It's also the first edition of D&D to have been in print 5+ years - since AD&D2E - with the PHB still proving a bestseller and all the 5e books still in print. In my personal experience, I've had many new players enjoy the game to the extent they have gone off to play in other 5e games or become DMs themselves. I would strongly argue none of this would have happened if 5E was not a quality game which appeals to a majority. In our social media saturated world poor quality would have killed 5e by now. That quality has also been a factor in it's popularity and enduring appeal. Quality does equate to popularity, the game's commercial success is an objectively incontrovertible measure of this. You don't like 5e? Fine. I don't like Earl Grey tea. You can't please all of the people all the time. Your views are as valid as anyone elses. I have never argued that they are not. However, they come across as an inflammatory attack on 5e due to the language used - edition warring. So what is the point of that language? Your view appears to be you hate 5e. It's valid but it antagonises people who like 5e. So is that viewpoint really worth expressing? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2e
Top