Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2E's reception?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 7906786" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>This is word games and misdirection, nothing more. I didn't say it did things to "them" I said it did things to the fanbase. Or, more accurately, I referenced WOTC making this statement/</p><p></p><p>Nothing of any relevance. Apathy and dissatifaction with the game as the best choice amongst options did far, far more.</p><p></p><p> Again, just playing word games. You start requiring me to be pedantic and qualifying every word and phrase and then when I play that game you'll turn around and pretend that me doing that undermines my position. Quite simply, context is clear. Maybe you can't wrap your brain around it, which is a reason to doubt the validity of your comments. Or maybe you simply need to obfuscate the conversation, which is a reason to doubt the validity of your comments.</p><p></p><p></p><p>25 happy people is better than 4. But this totally misses the point. As was noted 4E sold HUGE out of the gate. So lack of exposure was not an issue.</p><p></p><p>The bottom line is that some people loved 4E, some greatly disliked 4E and some people were 'meh' about it. But, in the end it was not among the top list of games of choice for way too many people. Unlike 1E, 3E, and WAAYY unlike 5E, the D&D brand took a hard drop under 4E's tenure. This doesn't mean that people didn't like it. It doesn't need to mean that. It only means that they liked it less than other choices. And that is what we know happened.</p><p></p><p>Again, the distinction here is already covered. </p><p>It would be idiotic to claim that there are not people who, to this day, <em>LOVE</em> 4E. But it is hard to find a 4E game online and it doesn't have much presence. I believe that those people who love 4E would be better off if their game had been more inclusive of the fanbase at large. </p><p></p><p>Unlike 4E, the book is FAR from closed on PF2E. And, to clarify here, I don't see PF2E alienating the PF fanbase at all as badly as 4E did to the D&D fanbase. So it could play out differently. But it does not seem things are leaning in the positive direction. </p><p></p><p>And with zero regard for that, the people who LOVE PF2E will continue to love PF2E. I have never been critical of loving PF2E. I was never critical of loving 4E. I stated over and over in each case that I appreciate the appeal to a certain niche and I only wish those playing the most fun experience possible. But, when people say that not playing a game, and posting critical comments about it can only be the result of closed-mindedness, fear of change, or other even more nefarious aggressive motives then those statements are just to easy to play with. And when people say that a game is widely popular despite all evidence to the contrary, well, that's just fun and I like to play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 7906786, member: 957"] This is word games and misdirection, nothing more. I didn't say it did things to "them" I said it did things to the fanbase. Or, more accurately, I referenced WOTC making this statement/ Nothing of any relevance. Apathy and dissatifaction with the game as the best choice amongst options did far, far more. Again, just playing word games. You start requiring me to be pedantic and qualifying every word and phrase and then when I play that game you'll turn around and pretend that me doing that undermines my position. Quite simply, context is clear. Maybe you can't wrap your brain around it, which is a reason to doubt the validity of your comments. Or maybe you simply need to obfuscate the conversation, which is a reason to doubt the validity of your comments. 25 happy people is better than 4. But this totally misses the point. As was noted 4E sold HUGE out of the gate. So lack of exposure was not an issue. The bottom line is that some people loved 4E, some greatly disliked 4E and some people were 'meh' about it. But, in the end it was not among the top list of games of choice for way too many people. Unlike 1E, 3E, and WAAYY unlike 5E, the D&D brand took a hard drop under 4E's tenure. This doesn't mean that people didn't like it. It doesn't need to mean that. It only means that they liked it less than other choices. And that is what we know happened. Again, the distinction here is already covered. It would be idiotic to claim that there are not people who, to this day, [I]LOVE[/I] 4E. But it is hard to find a 4E game online and it doesn't have much presence. I believe that those people who love 4E would be better off if their game had been more inclusive of the fanbase at large. Unlike 4E, the book is FAR from closed on PF2E. And, to clarify here, I don't see PF2E alienating the PF fanbase at all as badly as 4E did to the D&D fanbase. So it could play out differently. But it does not seem things are leaning in the positive direction. And with zero regard for that, the people who LOVE PF2E will continue to love PF2E. I have never been critical of loving PF2E. I was never critical of loving 4E. I stated over and over in each case that I appreciate the appeal to a certain niche and I only wish those playing the most fun experience possible. But, when people say that not playing a game, and posting critical comments about it can only be the result of closed-mindedness, fear of change, or other even more nefarious aggressive motives then those statements are just to easy to play with. And when people say that a game is widely popular despite all evidence to the contrary, well, that's just fun and I like to play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2E's reception?
Top