Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2nd Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Igwilly" data-source="post: 7358147" data-attributes="member: 6801225"><p>I’ll take a look at that, but it seems very weird. I haven’t seen this work in real-life at all: most new players who don’t want to get into splatbooks just say “I’ll stick with the basics” when I offer the books for them. And, honestly, I’m not sure I can trust the phrase “there’s a study that says…” by itself anymore, but that’s a whole other subject. Yes, I’ll take a time to view those studies, always a wise thing to do.</p><p></p><p>For what I’ve seem, the book buyer usually buys a lot of books when s/he can (money problems sometimes get into that).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, first:</p><p>The wealth of content present in 2e is one of the main reasons why I chose that edition instead of 1e. Its fans actually told about this amount of content in a positive light. 3.X was just broken from the start, and splatbooks follow on that, that’s why it’s not “the golden age”. As of 4e… Most well versed DMs aren’t afraid of allowing them: the core is strongly balanced, and splatbooks tend to follow that, so people felt safe – at list until mid-2010 or so.</p><p></p><p>The thing is, and I’ve always had problems explaining that, I’m not against a slower release schedule by itself, if it means more playtesting and better quality of additional material. I’m patient, and I have means of remaking my entire gaming world without changing characters, so that’s fine.</p><p>However, what I’ve seen is that, such people are not asking for slower release pace; they are asking for that extra content to be <strong>eliminated entirely</strong>. I’m not ok with, I want extra content, even if slower, but I want new classes, new races, new options for combat, magic, and so on. To say to me “the core is the only thing you’ll get” is a big letdown for me.</p><p>Yes, I understand about third-party publishing, but that’s not a good answer by itself. DMs and players are much more reserved about content not made by WotC. “Official” content at least makes people more secure about reading it and so forth. However, I cannot imagine anyone around here to have that same level of receptiveness with “unofficial” content, if the DMs ever consider the suggestion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Igwilly, post: 7358147, member: 6801225"] I’ll take a look at that, but it seems very weird. I haven’t seen this work in real-life at all: most new players who don’t want to get into splatbooks just say “I’ll stick with the basics” when I offer the books for them. And, honestly, I’m not sure I can trust the phrase “there’s a study that says…” by itself anymore, but that’s a whole other subject. Yes, I’ll take a time to view those studies, always a wise thing to do. For what I’ve seem, the book buyer usually buys a lot of books when s/he can (money problems sometimes get into that). Okay, first: The wealth of content present in 2e is one of the main reasons why I chose that edition instead of 1e. Its fans actually told about this amount of content in a positive light. 3.X was just broken from the start, and splatbooks follow on that, that’s why it’s not “the golden age”. As of 4e… Most well versed DMs aren’t afraid of allowing them: the core is strongly balanced, and splatbooks tend to follow that, so people felt safe – at list until mid-2010 or so. The thing is, and I’ve always had problems explaining that, I’m not against a slower release schedule by itself, if it means more playtesting and better quality of additional material. I’m patient, and I have means of remaking my entire gaming world without changing characters, so that’s fine. However, what I’ve seen is that, such people are not asking for slower release pace; they are asking for that extra content to be [B]eliminated entirely[/B]. I’m not ok with, I want extra content, even if slower, but I want new classes, new races, new options for combat, magic, and so on. To say to me “the core is the only thing you’ll get” is a big letdown for me. Yes, I understand about third-party publishing, but that’s not a good answer by itself. DMs and players are much more reserved about content not made by WotC. “Official” content at least makes people more secure about reading it and so forth. However, I cannot imagine anyone around here to have that same level of receptiveness with “unofficial” content, if the DMs ever consider the suggestion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder 2nd Edition
Top