Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder BETA - Some Sizzle, Not Much Steak
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 4427969" data-attributes="member: 10177"><p>The "Ramping up of power levels" is not bad. It looks to me like they did what they did to make staying the core class as viable as picking up PrC's or multi classing. So I don't look at it as "ramping up", but as making the Core Class so viable that taking PrC's or multi classing actually has costs, instead of power increases with no real loss/sacrifice. So I think what they did was needed, since WOTC screwed it up by making PrC's superior to the Core class.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Backwards compatibility. Is it? Not 100%, probably not even 80%. But it is EASY to have it be compatible with 3E. So for ease of mix and match, its as compatible as any 3E splat book.</p><p></p><p>So if you buy Pathfinder, you have to make a decision. Do I want Pathfinder as my core, or do I want the PH as my core? Choosing Pathfinder as your core will make "compatibility" much easier. Choosing the PH means your going to have to write up house rules spelling out what you do use from PF. </p><p></p><p>I don't know about you, but I did that for every single splat book put out by WOTC, and I bought almost every last one of them.</p><p></p><p>I agree high level play needs fixing. However to do that in a meaningful way would compromise "backwards compatibility" too much. To really make High level play work 3E needs rebuilt from the ground up in fundamental areas like DR, resistances, immunities, and saving throws.</p><p></p><p>So I am hoping Paizo will do their own "High Level Play" book showing what needs to be changed, and how, in order to make high level play much more viable for 3E.</p><p></p><p>They simply cannot do it in PF and maintain a decent level of compatibility with 3E Core.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Over all, I like what they are doing. I like the Barbarian Rage points and Monk Ki points. I like how much better written their skills are. I like their changes to feats, even Cleave.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line is Pathfinder Beta has me considering running 3E again, Pathfinder style. I never saw myself considering that again in this life time. When I finally feel I grasp their changes to "Combat" I'll know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 4427969, member: 10177"] The "Ramping up of power levels" is not bad. It looks to me like they did what they did to make staying the core class as viable as picking up PrC's or multi classing. So I don't look at it as "ramping up", but as making the Core Class so viable that taking PrC's or multi classing actually has costs, instead of power increases with no real loss/sacrifice. So I think what they did was needed, since WOTC screwed it up by making PrC's superior to the Core class. Backwards compatibility. Is it? Not 100%, probably not even 80%. But it is EASY to have it be compatible with 3E. So for ease of mix and match, its as compatible as any 3E splat book. So if you buy Pathfinder, you have to make a decision. Do I want Pathfinder as my core, or do I want the PH as my core? Choosing Pathfinder as your core will make "compatibility" much easier. Choosing the PH means your going to have to write up house rules spelling out what you do use from PF. I don't know about you, but I did that for every single splat book put out by WOTC, and I bought almost every last one of them. I agree high level play needs fixing. However to do that in a meaningful way would compromise "backwards compatibility" too much. To really make High level play work 3E needs rebuilt from the ground up in fundamental areas like DR, resistances, immunities, and saving throws. So I am hoping Paizo will do their own "High Level Play" book showing what needs to be changed, and how, in order to make high level play much more viable for 3E. They simply cannot do it in PF and maintain a decent level of compatibility with 3E Core. Over all, I like what they are doing. I like the Barbarian Rage points and Monk Ki points. I like how much better written their skills are. I like their changes to feats, even Cleave. Bottom line is Pathfinder Beta has me considering running 3E again, Pathfinder style. I never saw myself considering that again in this life time. When I finally feel I grasp their changes to "Combat" I'll know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder BETA - Some Sizzle, Not Much Steak
Top