Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vael" data-source="post: 4431272" data-attributes="member: 57043">This is what I'd like to see expanded. Because it's clear that my problems with 3.5 have not really been touched by Pathfinder. Problems like:- Slow high level play, math breakdown- Caster Dominance / Class balance in general- High DM Prep time- Multiclassing (specifically spellcasters, but this is an unknown as there are no multiclassing rules yet)So, yes I noticed the three examples given, grapple, Polymorph and skills have been changed, but I'd like to see how big issues like these were overlooked in favour of "fixing" cleave. Were they not considered issues or did they get trumped in the name of "Backwards compatibility"?I'm just curious what were the priorities, because a lot of Pathfinder seems like Paizo is more concerned with the colour of the car than fixing the transmission.</blockquote>