Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder BETA - Some Sizzle, Not Much Steak
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CBonnet" data-source="post: 4443839" data-attributes="member: 76097"><p>I think there's another aspect to keep in mind. Months ago, initial information was released by Wizards about licensing agreements to publish 4.0. Third party publishers were not allowed to continue publishing 3.5 content when they begin publishing 4.0. Also, I'm not sure how long Wizards would continue to license 3.5 D&D products. I'm not sure if Wizard licensing stance has changed in recent months, it's possible.</p><p> </p><p>So, it seems to me that Wizards has abandoned 3.5 D&D, which means the rest of the community (Paizo, you, me, other third-party publishers) have interesting and difficult decisions to make. Sure, individually we can continue playing version 3.5, our books will not disintegrate overnight. Still, publishers will need to produce and sell new product. New players will need to obtain the base rules system. Also, current and future OGL content will need some sort of rules system to be available.</p><p> </p><p>The Paizo boards had several postings related to the business decisions regarding Pathfinder. As I recall, another benefit is that Paizo could publish "4th D&D" licensed product at the same time as they release "Pathfinder RPG" content, since they're not reliant on Wizards to license "Pathfinder". I think other third-party publishers have also expressed some plans to publish "Pathfinder" related materials, since they could publish those alongside "4th D&D".</p><p> </p><p>My input to the Pathfinder discussion: I like the new character options, and I thought a lot of the rules were worded more carefully...I hope it will be harder to find examples where the rules are unclear or contradictory. I do hope that they continue to make changes. I would prefer to see more changes toward a 3.75, rather than keeping it very close to 3.5 and ending up with a 3.55. I do hope that Paizo will collect other opinions and rules options to develop some sort of "Unearthed Arcana" style collection of variant rules. </p><p> </p><p>One last comment, though I know this is already a long post, about the DM prep time for adventures. Probably my best comment about the Paizo "Rise of the Runelords" product is that it requires very minimal DM prep time. Several times we've started a session and I've only spent 30 minutes reading over the next few encounters. I don't believe this is because I'm some sort of master-DM, rather that the material gives a good understanding of the storyline and the enemy's motivations and goals.</p><p> </p><p>Regards,</p><p>Charles</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CBonnet, post: 4443839, member: 76097"] I think there's another aspect to keep in mind. Months ago, initial information was released by Wizards about licensing agreements to publish 4.0. Third party publishers were not allowed to continue publishing 3.5 content when they begin publishing 4.0. Also, I'm not sure how long Wizards would continue to license 3.5 D&D products. I'm not sure if Wizard licensing stance has changed in recent months, it's possible. So, it seems to me that Wizards has abandoned 3.5 D&D, which means the rest of the community (Paizo, you, me, other third-party publishers) have interesting and difficult decisions to make. Sure, individually we can continue playing version 3.5, our books will not disintegrate overnight. Still, publishers will need to produce and sell new product. New players will need to obtain the base rules system. Also, current and future OGL content will need some sort of rules system to be available. The Paizo boards had several postings related to the business decisions regarding Pathfinder. As I recall, another benefit is that Paizo could publish "4th D&D" licensed product at the same time as they release "Pathfinder RPG" content, since they're not reliant on Wizards to license "Pathfinder". I think other third-party publishers have also expressed some plans to publish "Pathfinder" related materials, since they could publish those alongside "4th D&D". My input to the Pathfinder discussion: I like the new character options, and I thought a lot of the rules were worded more carefully...I hope it will be harder to find examples where the rules are unclear or contradictory. I do hope that they continue to make changes. I would prefer to see more changes toward a 3.75, rather than keeping it very close to 3.5 and ending up with a 3.55. I do hope that Paizo will collect other opinions and rules options to develop some sort of "Unearthed Arcana" style collection of variant rules. One last comment, though I know this is already a long post, about the DM prep time for adventures. Probably my best comment about the Paizo "Rise of the Runelords" product is that it requires very minimal DM prep time. Several times we've started a session and I've only spent 30 minutes reading over the next few encounters. I don't believe this is because I'm some sort of master-DM, rather that the material gives a good understanding of the storyline and the enemy's motivations and goals. Regards, Charles [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder BETA - Some Sizzle, Not Much Steak
Top