Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CanadienneBacon" data-source="post: 4813813" data-attributes="member: 11146">Actually, I'm pretty sure that I read something about Varisian and the Varisian race, too...but the last time I was really into reading up on all my Pathfinder was Fall 2007, so it's hard to remember what tidbits were in which book, and where.&nbsp; I think it's also important to remember that we're dealing with a beta version of a ruleset that isn't yet published--there are bound to be inconsistencies in the beta that will (hopefully) see improvement by the time the official rulebook is released in August.&nbsp; Since we're dealing with so many supplements in this game, some of which we're bound to confuse in our minds with the 3.x PHB, this probably isn't the last rules discussion we see where someone states, &quot;X is true.&nbsp; I saw it here,&quot; only to have someone else retort, &quot;No, X is not true.&nbsp; Y is true.&nbsp; If you'll look in sub-section 19 of paragraph 8 of chapter 2 of Whidgamagidgit Rules Supplement...&quot;Personally, I try to go with what makes the most common sense for the specific situation.&nbsp; This does, however, often lead to inconsistency.&nbsp; C'est la D&amp;D, eh?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CanadienneBacon, post: 4813813, member: 11146"] Actually, I'm pretty sure that I read something about Varisian and the Varisian race, too...but the last time I was really into reading up on all my Pathfinder was Fall 2007, so it's hard to remember what tidbits were in which book, and where. I think it's also important to remember that we're dealing with a beta version of a ruleset that isn't yet published--there are bound to be inconsistencies in the beta that will (hopefully) see improvement by the time the official rulebook is released in August. Since we're dealing with so many supplements in this game, some of which we're bound to confuse in our minds with the 3.x PHB, this probably isn't the last rules discussion we see where someone states, "X is true. I saw it here," only to have someone else retort, "No, X is not true. Y is true. If you'll look in sub-section 19 of paragraph 8 of chapter 2 of Whidgamagidgit Rules Supplement..." Personally, I try to go with what makes the most common sense for the specific situation. This does, however, often lead to inconsistency. C'est la D&D, eh? [/QUOTE]

Verification