Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scott DeWar" data-source="post: 4816858" data-attributes="member: 49929">to Wulfratbane:Ok. It has been a while since i poked my head in here and I wanted to say that the gm's day trail blazer pdf is great! The first page art work is awsome. The second page to the very end is full of great information. The ten minute "workday" idea is worth looking at at the very least, implamenting preferable. The only 'bookkeeping' involved is done by the player as to what group do the spells fall into (Rote, Restricted or Ritual) and we use the "player makes all of the rolls method. defense rolls in stead of the gm rolling for the monsters attack.(it is in one of the source books somewhere...Uneared arcana maybe?) I have already tried the encounter design charts and foud them to be 'crisp and clean!' and now to the treasure bundles:The last pages have those charts with the spaces to give 'encounter designators' for the party advancement. that is about the best thing since sliced bread. Record keeping just got simple!My ony gripe is that my old eyes, compounded by a cateract in my left eye, makes the font size a little on the difficult to read side, so with a little copy and paste to a word document i was able to re size the font and now i can read it without eyestrain. Problem solved.and now for a few questions:1) is the mention of reserve points mentioned in the gm 's day teaser pdf? I could  not find that , but found it here in this thread2)I saw in the thread here that action points or reserve points being used. which do you prefer? I am getting ready to read up on action point today.3)wandering moster encounter charts were mentioned but elaborated upon. might I suggest the wandering monster charts from the dmg of the 2nd ed game system? if that is not accessable, i might be able to fnd an electronic copy somewhere to copy and paste.and now for the big final two part question:4) is there a final document with even more information anwhen is it going to be out?thanks in advance for your response</blockquote>

Verification