Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Epic level conventions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fireinthedust" data-source="post: 5357434" data-attributes="member: 51930"><p>JJ: I wonder if the issue is the concept of the game. What are you going to pitch to people to get them to buy an actual Epic game?</p><p></p><p>If I was doing it, frankly, I'd do one of the perfect-bound books you folks do for settings like Osirion. Market to the people who would by a fraction of a campaign setting and love it. That's your numbers, do the book-math.</p><p></p><p> OR make it a part of an APG book, one that has base classes already, that you know people are going to buy. Less risk, but if there's a regular book planned for either new rules or new setting material, why not?</p><p></p><p>Second: the big issue I have is the 50/50 rule is right out. How to account for it? And conceptually, it's the opposite of the E6 setting, which the Bestiary is designed for already (Ie: Dragons are what you expect them to be without needing the advanced template *always*, and you never need to adjust monster stats because they're already what you want; the only issue is customizing). </p><p></p><p>The concept is the opposite end of the spectrum because the book assumes E6, in a way. A hard wall to climb is DC20. You can make that so easily in E6. By E20+, there isn't a wall they can't climb, really. When you go beyond E6, so that climbing a wall becomes flying 30 ft over a wall, you're going outside the structure of the 1-20 setting implied by the Bestiary.</p><p></p><p>I think if you designed a setting for an epic game, that would help. It would need to be compelling, and it would need to somehow incorporate the 50/50 rule. Like the above Space game, or something like it. You'd need something other than the traditional D&D or even Pathfinder setting, because that's designed for a 1-20 system. It assumes that you can fit all the concepts for threats (ie: dragons, trolls, giants, medusa, titans, etc.) into it already, and has already fitted them in. </p><p></p><p>An epic setting... I guess it'd need to be between worlds and in many hostile settings, so all the magic the players need would be, well, needed. </p><p></p><p>But, and here's a devil's advocate: is the lure of Epic play there because the people playing it are rules-savy? </p><p></p><p>I know I'm drawn to it because of the theory: could you do it? Also, if I actually had a PC who was that powerful, and could use all the options I'd purchased in 3.x and PF, what could I do with that?</p><p></p><p>I think the Epic crowd are mostly DMs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fireinthedust, post: 5357434, member: 51930"] JJ: I wonder if the issue is the concept of the game. What are you going to pitch to people to get them to buy an actual Epic game? If I was doing it, frankly, I'd do one of the perfect-bound books you folks do for settings like Osirion. Market to the people who would by a fraction of a campaign setting and love it. That's your numbers, do the book-math. OR make it a part of an APG book, one that has base classes already, that you know people are going to buy. Less risk, but if there's a regular book planned for either new rules or new setting material, why not? Second: the big issue I have is the 50/50 rule is right out. How to account for it? And conceptually, it's the opposite of the E6 setting, which the Bestiary is designed for already (Ie: Dragons are what you expect them to be without needing the advanced template *always*, and you never need to adjust monster stats because they're already what you want; the only issue is customizing). The concept is the opposite end of the spectrum because the book assumes E6, in a way. A hard wall to climb is DC20. You can make that so easily in E6. By E20+, there isn't a wall they can't climb, really. When you go beyond E6, so that climbing a wall becomes flying 30 ft over a wall, you're going outside the structure of the 1-20 setting implied by the Bestiary. I think if you designed a setting for an epic game, that would help. It would need to be compelling, and it would need to somehow incorporate the 50/50 rule. Like the above Space game, or something like it. You'd need something other than the traditional D&D or even Pathfinder setting, because that's designed for a 1-20 system. It assumes that you can fit all the concepts for threats (ie: dragons, trolls, giants, medusa, titans, etc.) into it already, and has already fitted them in. An epic setting... I guess it'd need to be between worlds and in many hostile settings, so all the magic the players need would be, well, needed. But, and here's a devil's advocate: is the lure of Epic play there because the people playing it are rules-savy? I know I'm drawn to it because of the theory: could you do it? Also, if I actually had a PC who was that powerful, and could use all the options I'd purchased in 3.x and PF, what could I do with that? I think the Epic crowd are mostly DMs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Epic level conventions?
Top