Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Epic level conventions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 5359137" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>I think the loose guidelines given in the rules for epic level is fine with one exception. It always bothered me that the total number of attacks were capped. I felt that was an artificial handicap on Fighters and warriors in general. Hence for epic games if I could houserule, that was always done away with. I am a big fan of continuing the rules as they are presented...so BAB, attacks, spells, etc. keep progressing as they have. If they want to balance it out more...perhaps ADDING a set of rules on top of that would be better.</p><p></p><p>In a way the rules describe, it as such in PF from what I've seen in it's very small and loose explanation for those who want to continue such, with the exception of Attacks. I'd prefer spell tables up to where they can cast 10 spells of every level 1-9 or even 1-10...BUT I'm fine with how it is done with PF as well. It all works and is easy enough to figure out that I'm fine with what's in the rules already without them ever having to do an Epic level book.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 5359137, member: 4348"] I think the loose guidelines given in the rules for epic level is fine with one exception. It always bothered me that the total number of attacks were capped. I felt that was an artificial handicap on Fighters and warriors in general. Hence for epic games if I could houserule, that was always done away with. I am a big fan of continuing the rules as they are presented...so BAB, attacks, spells, etc. keep progressing as they have. If they want to balance it out more...perhaps ADDING a set of rules on top of that would be better. In a way the rules describe, it as such in PF from what I've seen in it's very small and loose explanation for those who want to continue such, with the exception of Attacks. I'd prefer spell tables up to where they can cast 10 spells of every level 1-9 or even 1-10...BUT I'm fine with how it is done with PF as well. It all works and is easy enough to figure out that I'm fine with what's in the rules already without them ever having to do an Epic level book. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Epic level conventions?
Top