Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Twowolves" data-source="post: 4879823" data-attributes="member: 18093">By my definition of &quot;reasonable&quot;, your question has been answered several times over. Obviously your definition is not the same as mine, because you won't take no for an answer.&quot;no offense, but you are as ugly as sin and smell funny too&quot;Putting a throwaway line at the end of one post saying you are happy for them and saying &quot;don't get me wrong/no offense/bless their hearts&quot; before you butt heads with the author and publisher of the game doesn't make it seem any less hostile. Is it not reasonable for me to say that my reading of your posts come across as hostile without having to explain WHY I feel that way? Or are we settled on the definition of &quot;reasonable&quot;?Because A) anti-4th ed people claimed that WotC under-printed their 4th ed PHB specifically so they could make the claim of &quot;sold out&quot;, and without print numbers the rumor won't go away, so when PRPG sells out and a strong advocate of 4th ed comes into the thread and asks for print run numbers, it seems like thinly veiled hostility, especially when you won't.... let... go....and B) representatives from Paizo have flat out told you &quot;we are not releasing that information, and we aren't saying what our reasons are&quot;, but you STILL persist in asking/defending yourself for asking, and doing it here instead of in a separate thread. To my mind, it looks hostile as hell.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Twowolves, post: 4879823, member: 18093"] By my definition of "reasonable", your question has been answered several times over. Obviously your definition is not the same as mine, because you won't take no for an answer. "no offense, but you are as ugly as sin and smell funny too" Putting a throwaway line at the end of one post saying you are happy for them and saying "don't get me wrong/no offense/bless their hearts" before you butt heads with the author and publisher of the game doesn't make it seem any less hostile. Is it not reasonable for me to say that my reading of your posts come across as hostile without having to explain [B]WHY [/B]I feel that way? Or are we settled on the definition of "reasonable"? Because A) anti-4th ed people claimed that WotC under-printed their 4th ed PHB specifically so they could make the claim of "sold out", and without print numbers the rumor won't go away, so when PRPG sells out and a strong advocate of 4th ed comes into the thread and asks for print run numbers, it seems like thinly veiled hostility, especially when you [I]won't[/I].... [I]let[/I]... [I]go[/I].... and B) representatives from Paizo have flat out told you "we are not releasing that information, and we aren't saying what our reasons are", but you STILL persist in asking/defending yourself for asking, and doing it here instead of in a separate thread. To my mind, it looks hostile as hell. [/QUOTE]

Verification