Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder: Fixing the TWF Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="roguerouge" data-source="post: 4253357" data-attributes="member: 13855"><p>The 3.5 TWF ranger, in my opinion, was pretty badly designed. Did Pathfinder do enough to fix the Ranger?</p><p></p><p>Here's the issues with the 3.5 version:</p><p></p><p>Everything he does, someone else can do better: he's a poor spell caster, his animal companion is weak, rogues and bards do as well or better at skills, his combat suffers from lagging in BAB due to the TWF penalty. He's a bard with better marketing.</p><p></p><p>The enemies whom he can hit regularly are the low AC brute monsters. Those brute monsters, of course, can pummel him quickly, taking advantage of his poor AC and mediocre HP. </p><p></p><p>And he's got a scorching case of MAD. He needs dexterity (for AC), constitution (to compensate for d8s), strength (for melee damage), Intelligence (for skills), and Wisdom (so that he can have 2-3 spells at 7th level). The Monk is NOT the poster child for MAD; the TWF ranger is.</p><p></p><p>The favored enemies schtick is incredibly dependent on DM fiat and favor. Choose poorly and you get to wait a long, long time to use that ability: until 5th level. If the game goes in a different direction than the DM intends, if communication's less than perfect, then this ability goes right down the drain.</p><p></p><p>Ah, but what about the wilderness, you say? Tracking works poorly in adventure paths and modules, because the authors have to assume that parties don't necessarily have a tracker in the party, so it provides extra information, but not essential information. And it does so maybe once or twice a story. And if your DM hand waves this stuff or does the requisite "one wandering monster encounter" satirized by Order of the Stick, then this is much ado about nothing. And, again, barbarians and druids do this just as well as the ranger.</p><p></p><p>What about skills? There are at least five skills you want to keep maxed out as a 3.x ranger: survival, spot, listen, hide, move silently. (And, maxing out those five skills lets you do three things, not five.) That leaves 1 point plus the points from INT and race left. We haven't even dealt with the Handle Animal skill. That undermines the "rangers are versatile" argument. </p><p></p><p>And don't even get me started on what the Scout's done to this class.</p><p></p><p>So. Those were the problems. Did terrain mastery and skill telescoping and other hacks do enough to make the TWF viable again?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="roguerouge, post: 4253357, member: 13855"] The 3.5 TWF ranger, in my opinion, was pretty badly designed. Did Pathfinder do enough to fix the Ranger? Here's the issues with the 3.5 version: Everything he does, someone else can do better: he's a poor spell caster, his animal companion is weak, rogues and bards do as well or better at skills, his combat suffers from lagging in BAB due to the TWF penalty. He's a bard with better marketing. The enemies whom he can hit regularly are the low AC brute monsters. Those brute monsters, of course, can pummel him quickly, taking advantage of his poor AC and mediocre HP. And he's got a scorching case of MAD. He needs dexterity (for AC), constitution (to compensate for d8s), strength (for melee damage), Intelligence (for skills), and Wisdom (so that he can have 2-3 spells at 7th level). The Monk is NOT the poster child for MAD; the TWF ranger is. The favored enemies schtick is incredibly dependent on DM fiat and favor. Choose poorly and you get to wait a long, long time to use that ability: until 5th level. If the game goes in a different direction than the DM intends, if communication's less than perfect, then this ability goes right down the drain. Ah, but what about the wilderness, you say? Tracking works poorly in adventure paths and modules, because the authors have to assume that parties don't necessarily have a tracker in the party, so it provides extra information, but not essential information. And it does so maybe once or twice a story. And if your DM hand waves this stuff or does the requisite "one wandering monster encounter" satirized by Order of the Stick, then this is much ado about nothing. And, again, barbarians and druids do this just as well as the ranger. What about skills? There are at least five skills you want to keep maxed out as a 3.x ranger: survival, spot, listen, hide, move silently. (And, maxing out those five skills lets you do three things, not five.) That leaves 1 point plus the points from INT and race left. We haven't even dealt with the Handle Animal skill. That undermines the "rangers are versatile" argument. And don't even get me started on what the Scout's done to this class. So. Those were the problems. Did terrain mastery and skill telescoping and other hacks do enough to make the TWF viable again? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder: Fixing the TWF Ranger
Top