Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder: Fixing the TWF Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JRRNeiklot" data-source="post: 4286409" data-attributes="member: 717"><p>Every dm is a game designer. The combat styles are just stupid, period. No other class gets shoehorned into a combat style, why the ranger? A ranger (or any other class ) should pick his feats like any other and fight however the hell he pleases. TWf is a legacy from 2e that should go away. Being good at woodcraft does not make one suddenly good at twf or archery or tiddleywinks. Combat paths are bad design, and it doesn't take a game designer to figure that out. The suggestion on the boards is always add a sword and board style and a skirmish style and a two handed cleave style and a spoon and fork style, when a much simpler mechanic would be to just remove the damned combat paths altogether. There's been quite a few people to suggest that, but I guess Paizo is afraid to scrap it and annoy their 4e overlords.</p><p></p><p>I know it sounds like I complain a lot, but it's only because I desperately want Pathfinder to be a game I can play without scrapping half the system. Sadly, that doesn't appear to be the case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JRRNeiklot, post: 4286409, member: 717"] Every dm is a game designer. The combat styles are just stupid, period. No other class gets shoehorned into a combat style, why the ranger? A ranger (or any other class ) should pick his feats like any other and fight however the hell he pleases. TWf is a legacy from 2e that should go away. Being good at woodcraft does not make one suddenly good at twf or archery or tiddleywinks. Combat paths are bad design, and it doesn't take a game designer to figure that out. The suggestion on the boards is always add a sword and board style and a skirmish style and a two handed cleave style and a spoon and fork style, when a much simpler mechanic would be to just remove the damned combat paths altogether. There's been quite a few people to suggest that, but I guess Paizo is afraid to scrap it and annoy their 4e overlords. I know it sounds like I complain a lot, but it's only because I desperately want Pathfinder to be a game I can play without scrapping half the system. Sadly, that doesn't appear to be the case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder: Fixing the TWF Ranger
Top