Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder: Is it evidence that new editions don't need to be that different?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack99" data-source="post: 4939235" data-attributes="member: 53135"><p>I agree that it's not the only business model. But calling something that worked for 30 years shortsighted is a bit odd. I mean, the business of RPG's is only as old as D&D. </p><p></p><p>Also, I think you are missing a very important thing that WOtC has changed in their business model. The DDI. The DDI is what will keep WotC alive and well through all the edition changes (IMO).</p><p></p><p>Because with every edition change, they lose players. Or rather, they lose customers. Because they are who they are, they also bring a lot of new players into the business, but my guess, and this is just a guess, is that with every edition, fewer and fewer people are playing the current edition. </p><p></p><p>Now, with the DDI, WotC has just struck gold. When they announce 5e, a good chunk of the DDI subscribers will howl and demand Bill's head on a platter, wow'ing that they will never play 5e, because it's too anime and like a videogame. They will stick to their good old 4e. And thus keep paying for the DDI - because let's face it, the CB and MM alone are more than worth the $5-8 a month. Even if some people aren't convinced of that atm, I can assure you that the number of subscribers to the DDI will only go one way as more is released for 4e - up.</p><p></p><p>So, anyway. WotC releases 5e, but unlike with the previous editions, they keep a decent income from it, via the DDI. Because at this point, it's just money in the bank, since it's just maintenance. </p><p></p><p>The other possibility is that they keep a staff of a couple of guys that keep producing choice 4e stuff, released solely via the DDI.</p><p></p><p>/shrug</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack99, post: 4939235, member: 53135"] I agree that it's not the only business model. But calling something that worked for 30 years shortsighted is a bit odd. I mean, the business of RPG's is only as old as D&D. Also, I think you are missing a very important thing that WOtC has changed in their business model. The DDI. The DDI is what will keep WotC alive and well through all the edition changes (IMO). Because with every edition change, they lose players. Or rather, they lose customers. Because they are who they are, they also bring a lot of new players into the business, but my guess, and this is just a guess, is that with every edition, fewer and fewer people are playing the current edition. Now, with the DDI, WotC has just struck gold. When they announce 5e, a good chunk of the DDI subscribers will howl and demand Bill's head on a platter, wow'ing that they will never play 5e, because it's too anime and like a videogame. They will stick to their good old 4e. And thus keep paying for the DDI - because let's face it, the CB and MM alone are more than worth the $5-8 a month. Even if some people aren't convinced of that atm, I can assure you that the number of subscribers to the DDI will only go one way as more is released for 4e - up. So, anyway. WotC releases 5e, but unlike with the previous editions, they keep a decent income from it, via the DDI. Because at this point, it's just money in the bank, since it's just maintenance. The other possibility is that they keep a staff of a couple of guys that keep producing choice 4e stuff, released solely via the DDI. /shrug [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder: Is it evidence that new editions don't need to be that different?
Top