Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Psionics (from Dreamscarred)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Admiral Caine" data-source="post: 4897488" data-attributes="member: 60438"><p>I've already posted at your forums, and briefly at Paizo's...</p><p> </p><p>1.) Mostly I want balance with the Core Classes. Within reason. Just last night a Paizo Editor said that <u>absolute</u> balance makes for boring gameplay (and I personally think it's an impossible goal).. but we do need balance within all reason. Players and GM's should not view Psionics as an easy exploit. There has to be faith that the underlying rules are fair.</p><p> </p><p>I know you feel that the XPH was balanced, and I'm not in a position to refute that. I'm just sayin'... </p><p> </p><p>2.) I want such a book to embrace Pathfinder, not try to fix it. That means working with Paizo's design strategies. I really beat that into the ground at your own forums, and I'm happy with what you had to say- so I won't belabor it here.</p><p> </p><p>3.) Streamlined gameplay and no excessive book keeping. I've heard it said over at Paizo that they wouldn't mind seeing psionics get away from the point system and adopt a slot system (for balance purposes and streamlining). However, *I* don't need to abandon points just because they said that. The trick is just keep the book keeping easy and streamline where you can. </p><p> </p><p>Many will argue that the existing system just uses basic math, and I agree with that wholeheartedly. It's just basic math. The problem is, you put a player on the spot and they'll have a helluva time picking out the right dice to roll, let alone figure out their power attack. They're not stupid people by any measure, but the brain jams when you throw a spotlight on them.</p><p> </p><p>Again, I'm actually reassuring you that a point system is okay.. just keep the book keeping straightforward.</p><p> </p><p>(Disclaimer: I NEVER EVER used 3.5 psionics.. I'm speaking only to what my players tell me about their experiences.. so if I sound crazy I'm relaying their concerns second hand)</p><p> </p><p>***********************</p><p> </p><p>Side note: I would bet money that Paizo does not touch psionics in all of 2010. Based on something said last night, they may not touch it in <u>2011</u>. If that's the case, I'm ready to support a 3rd party psioncis product for Pathfinder. There's no reason to wait for Psionics for 3 years just so Paizo can do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Admiral Caine, post: 4897488, member: 60438"] I've already posted at your forums, and briefly at Paizo's... 1.) Mostly I want balance with the Core Classes. Within reason. Just last night a Paizo Editor said that [U]absolute[/U] balance makes for boring gameplay (and I personally think it's an impossible goal).. but we do need balance within all reason. Players and GM's should not view Psionics as an easy exploit. There has to be faith that the underlying rules are fair. I know you feel that the XPH was balanced, and I'm not in a position to refute that. I'm just sayin'... 2.) I want such a book to embrace Pathfinder, not try to fix it. That means working with Paizo's design strategies. I really beat that into the ground at your own forums, and I'm happy with what you had to say- so I won't belabor it here. 3.) Streamlined gameplay and no excessive book keeping. I've heard it said over at Paizo that they wouldn't mind seeing psionics get away from the point system and adopt a slot system (for balance purposes and streamlining). However, *I* don't need to abandon points just because they said that. The trick is just keep the book keeping easy and streamline where you can. Many will argue that the existing system just uses basic math, and I agree with that wholeheartedly. It's just basic math. The problem is, you put a player on the spot and they'll have a helluva time picking out the right dice to roll, let alone figure out their power attack. They're not stupid people by any measure, but the brain jams when you throw a spotlight on them. Again, I'm actually reassuring you that a point system is okay.. just keep the book keeping straightforward. (Disclaimer: I NEVER EVER used 3.5 psionics.. I'm speaking only to what my players tell me about their experiences.. so if I sound crazy I'm relaying their concerns second hand) *********************** Side note: I would bet money that Paizo does not touch psionics in all of 2010. Based on something said last night, they may not touch it in [U]2011[/U]. If that's the case, I'm ready to support a 3rd party psioncis product for Pathfinder. There's no reason to wait for Psionics for 3 years just so Paizo can do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Psionics (from Dreamscarred)
Top