Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EricNoah" data-source="post: 4809094" data-attributes="member: 4">There are a couple of interesting ways one could go with this...1) You could stay mostly with 3.5, but continue to use Paizo's PF modules and supplements for adventure and setting material.&nbsp; You might want to have a copy of the PF RPG on hand if you want details on anything that's very specific to that version of the game, but if not you could always just ignore anything that's not straight 3.5.&nbsp; (This is probably the way I will go). 2) You could go mostly PF RPG, but continue to use your old 3.5 modules and supplements for adventure and setting material.&nbsp; You might want to have handy access to the 3.5 SRD in case something from an old module needs clarification.&nbsp; 3) Go whole hog PF RPG.&nbsp; My guess is folks will do a lot of mixing and matching between PF RPG and 3.5.&nbsp; My instinct is that you would want the PCs to be either all PF or all 3.5 for the sake of balance on the PCs' side of the table.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EricNoah, post: 4809094, member: 4"] There are a couple of interesting ways one could go with this... 1) You could stay mostly with 3.5, but continue to use Paizo's PF modules and supplements for adventure and setting material. You might want to have a copy of the PF RPG on hand if you want details on anything that's very specific to that version of the game, but if not you could always just ignore anything that's not straight 3.5. (This is probably the way I will go). 2) You could go mostly PF RPG, but continue to use your old 3.5 modules and supplements for adventure and setting material. You might want to have handy access to the 3.5 SRD in case something from an old module needs clarification. 3) Go whole hog PF RPG. My guess is folks will do a lot of mixing and matching between PF RPG and 3.5. My instinct is that you would want the PCs to be either all PF or all 3.5 for the sake of balance on the PCs' side of the table. [/QUOTE]

Verification