Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Max Money AWA" data-source="post: 4585349" data-attributes="member: 80989">Latest news on PathfinderI happened to hear on a new podcast (the name escapes me at the moment) an interview with Jason Bulmahn in which he said that the Pathfinder book, and yes it is singular, will be in the 600 page range. And from the pdfs they have out, I'm guessing this rulebook will be a combination of the PHB and DMG. I also came to this conclusion after seeing the pre-release of the Pathfinder Bestiary as a separate book.I am in two Pathfinder games and running one of my own. I like the changes made. The consolidation of skills, class options, and spell changes all make sense while remaining compatible to 3.X rules. My game, which started recently at 1st level, will be strictly Pathfinder until 6th level. Then I will allow 3.X material if any of the players want to use any of it. In my opinion, I think this (Pathfinder) is what 4E should have been.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Max Money AWA, post: 4585349, member: 80989"] [b]Latest news on Pathfinder[/b] I happened to hear on a new podcast ([I]the name escapes me at the moment[/I]) an interview with Jason Bulmahn in which he said that the Pathfinder book, and yes it is singular, will be in the 600 page range. And from the pdfs they have out, I'm guessing this rulebook will be a combination of the PHB and DMG. I also came to this conclusion after seeing the pre-release of the Pathfinder Bestiary as a separate book. I am in two Pathfinder games and running one of my own. I like the changes made. The consolidation of skills, class options, and spell changes all make sense while remaining compatible to 3.X rules. My game, which started recently at 1st level, will be strictly Pathfinder until 6th level. Then I will allow 3.X material if any of the players want to use any of it. In my opinion, I think this ([I]Pathfinder[/I]) is what 4E should have been. [/QUOTE]

Verification