Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4157174" data-attributes="member: 710">Off course, that has been done for 4E, too, and a lot of the Pathfinder fans don't seem to like it. That doesn't tell us whether different changes wouldn't be appreciated, but I will not count on it.Pathfinder seems to be turning more in something like an Arcana Evolved game - classes that share similar roles, but are differently executed. I think AE was very % compatible with 3E in that way that you could use the classes together and shouldn't notice much problems with them interacting. If Pathfinder manages to change stuff without skewing balance (the first Fighter write-up didn't look like it, but I am not up-to-date any more), it can work fine. [spoiler]Somewhat, I hate myself writing and commenting on Pathfinder. I love everything basically everything I heard so far on 4E, and simply can't believe that Pathfinder will be able to compare to 4E in playability.But I want to discuss Pathfinder on its own merit. But I always feel that my 4E fanboyismn will color everything what I say and think on Pathfinder in negatively. I sometimes doubt I can judge it fairly, and if that was true, wouldn't I end up being the Pathfinder equivalent to a "4E hater", and being exactly what I disliked on the 4E forum? Could someone interested in Pathfinder actually read something useful or meaningful in my posts, or am I just an annoyance, spoiling his fun discussing the new cool stuff in the game?[/meta][/spoiler]</blockquote>

Verification