Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Second Edition: I hear it's bad - Why Bad, How Bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 7638749" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Not my experience with 5E. I liked 5E better than 4E, but once you obtained advantage and had <strong>bless</strong> you pretty much were done doing much else than damage. We quit 5E and went back to PF1 because 5E was way too generic. You felt like your choices gave you power? We played the game and found that if you weren't a multi-class paladin of some type or an archer, you weren't as powerful as anyone that was one of those types. We allowed all customization options and were told by 5E players that is why we didn't like 5E. Why? Because taking paladin multiclass was a no brainer no matter the class. 2 to 6 levels of paladin mixed with almost any other class made you way better than any other class. One guy made a paladin wizard with a whip that made the guy playing a straight paladin hate his class because the whip guy had more spell slots to smite and did it with reach with the whip. He hated the sorcerer paladin because he also had more spell slots to smite with. He also hated the warlock paladin for the same reason. And the entire game was get advantage by any means necessary, then you were done since advantage didn't stack with anything else no matter how it was obtained. Super boring. And archer with the right feats was a monster damage dealer. </p><p></p><p>I figure 5E is as popular as it is because of how easy it is to play. My friend plays with his kids. You can play a pick up game and teach just about anyone the game in an hour regardless of their experience. 5E is a great game for a wide demographic to introduce them to role-playing. For advanced players looking for more it's not a very robust system, but with a good DM even advanced players can have fun. If your primary interest is role-playing in a very simple, fluid system with someone of any age or experience, then 5E is your game. </p><p></p><p>PF2 is still a game for players that want more in their game system. It's definitely not 4E and doesn't feel like 4E at all. It's more like 5E on steroids.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 7638749, member: 5834"] Not my experience with 5E. I liked 5E better than 4E, but once you obtained advantage and had [b]bless[/b] you pretty much were done doing much else than damage. We quit 5E and went back to PF1 because 5E was way too generic. You felt like your choices gave you power? We played the game and found that if you weren't a multi-class paladin of some type or an archer, you weren't as powerful as anyone that was one of those types. We allowed all customization options and were told by 5E players that is why we didn't like 5E. Why? Because taking paladin multiclass was a no brainer no matter the class. 2 to 6 levels of paladin mixed with almost any other class made you way better than any other class. One guy made a paladin wizard with a whip that made the guy playing a straight paladin hate his class because the whip guy had more spell slots to smite and did it with reach with the whip. He hated the sorcerer paladin because he also had more spell slots to smite with. He also hated the warlock paladin for the same reason. And the entire game was get advantage by any means necessary, then you were done since advantage didn't stack with anything else no matter how it was obtained. Super boring. And archer with the right feats was a monster damage dealer. I figure 5E is as popular as it is because of how easy it is to play. My friend plays with his kids. You can play a pick up game and teach just about anyone the game in an hour regardless of their experience. 5E is a great game for a wide demographic to introduce them to role-playing. For advanced players looking for more it's not a very robust system, but with a good DM even advanced players can have fun. If your primary interest is role-playing in a very simple, fluid system with someone of any age or experience, then 5E is your game. PF2 is still a game for players that want more in their game system. It's definitely not 4E and doesn't feel like 4E at all. It's more like 5E on steroids. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Second Edition: I hear it's bad - Why Bad, How Bad?
Top