Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Setting: Map up!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Jacobs" data-source="post: 3566339" data-attributes="member: 23937"><p>First off; thanks for all the comments on the map, everyone! We're still a few weeks off from pulling the print lever for the first Pathfinder, and as a result we're still tinkering with some names and stuff. The look of the map is done though; is it generic? In some ways, I suppose so, but that's sort of the point. With Pathfinder, we're not trying to forge new ground. (Not yet, at least.) By making the first Adventure Path (first few, in fact) easilly convertable to Greyhawk, Forgotten Realms, and most other standard D&D campaigns, there's going to be a certain level of familiarity. As the designer of the original map turnover, I can say that I drew more inspiration from Greyhawk and Robert E. Howard than from Tolkien when designing the look of the map, but the maps of Middle Earth ARE pretty cool. In any case, there are certainly regions in our still-developing campaign world that are pretty unique, and they'll be revealed in due time. But for now, we're staying pretty close to "classic D&D" with Pathfinder.</p><p></p><p>A few of the names are doubtless going to change as well; the Varisian Bay is turning into the Varisian Gulf, for example; it IS too big to be a bay, after all. Most of the names are pretty set, and my hope is that given time, those who think they're silly or boring will get used to them. I mean, we've gotten used to Wooly Bay or Geoff or Vast Swamp or Mount Doom, right?</p><p></p><p>As for the other geological features, yes, there is a reason for the cliff that separates the verdant lowlands from the rugged badlands (they're not quite deserts, but there's not an awful lot of grass and trees up there either). As for more details about the region... those'll be coming out in Pathfinder and on the blog over at paizo.com over the next several months.</p><p></p><p>ANYway... again, thanks for the comments! Keep them comming! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Jacobs, post: 3566339, member: 23937"] First off; thanks for all the comments on the map, everyone! We're still a few weeks off from pulling the print lever for the first Pathfinder, and as a result we're still tinkering with some names and stuff. The look of the map is done though; is it generic? In some ways, I suppose so, but that's sort of the point. With Pathfinder, we're not trying to forge new ground. (Not yet, at least.) By making the first Adventure Path (first few, in fact) easilly convertable to Greyhawk, Forgotten Realms, and most other standard D&D campaigns, there's going to be a certain level of familiarity. As the designer of the original map turnover, I can say that I drew more inspiration from Greyhawk and Robert E. Howard than from Tolkien when designing the look of the map, but the maps of Middle Earth ARE pretty cool. In any case, there are certainly regions in our still-developing campaign world that are pretty unique, and they'll be revealed in due time. But for now, we're staying pretty close to "classic D&D" with Pathfinder. A few of the names are doubtless going to change as well; the Varisian Bay is turning into the Varisian Gulf, for example; it IS too big to be a bay, after all. Most of the names are pretty set, and my hope is that given time, those who think they're silly or boring will get used to them. I mean, we've gotten used to Wooly Bay or Geoff or Vast Swamp or Mount Doom, right? As for the other geological features, yes, there is a reason for the cliff that separates the verdant lowlands from the rugged badlands (they're not quite deserts, but there's not an awful lot of grass and trees up there either). As for more details about the region... those'll be coming out in Pathfinder and on the blog over at paizo.com over the next several months. ANYway... again, thanks for the comments! Keep them comming! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder Setting: Map up!
Top