Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="glass" data-source="post: 9006319" data-attributes="member: 12251">Does not follow. I can claim an orange is an orange, without also having to concede that an apple is an orange.We will not know for sure whether this is a an apple or an orange until we see the finished product (or its AoN equivalent) but I do not see any reason to assume Paizo is lying just because WotC has a history of doing so.I missed that. Is there any more info about what is happening to them?I am fine with Player Core and GM Core, but I worry about Player Core 2; when WotC released PHB2 (both time) it sold well as an individual product but caused confusion and ill feeling that hurt the line over all. This feels like it has the potential to be the same.This is flat out not true. They announced in January that they intended to move away from the OGL. There is no way to do that without either a new edition or at least revised core books. EDIT: It may have been February. The point is we have known for a long time that something is coming, and fairly soon. Just not the exact form it would take.They are a business (and we should always remember that - even the friendliest business is not our friend), but they are very "dissimilar to WotC".Notice that [USER=5142]@Aldarc[/USER] said "fighter or warlord". Warlord was a support class.It is, but nobody is doing that. If you argued that the nerfs to casters in PF2 compared with PF1 went to far in some cases I would agree with you. But you are way overreaching!</blockquote>

Verification