Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder To Get New Core Rulebooks Soon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 9011741" data-attributes="member: 6778210"><p>Again, do you have any actual proof that they knew they were going to do this at the time? You keep dismissing the idea that the OGL situation ended up speeding this up, but you really don't have any proof of that. If you have some, I'd love to see it. I'm open to being convinced.</p><p></p><p>I suppose my confusion here is that you're acting like this is some sort of betrayal, but they've been doing this sort of thing for a while. New printings of the PF2 Core Rulebook have had updated errata, with one class getting particular work. If you want to complain that they are making rulebooks "useless" by changing them, you're a little late for that debate. My rulebook does not have the most up-to-date errata for the Alchemist, so did they screw me, too?</p><p></p><p>That last point is, I think, the biggest thing here: they've been doing updates, which is something that Wizards hasn't done. I think you can argue either strategy being better, but at the end it's something they've been doing for a while. Wanting to further remove the OGL stuff along with basically reedit the books into a smoother format (something which has been a rather widely-made critique of the original set) and I just don't see how this is "screwing" anyone. This is just comes off as taking a window they've been given to push through a bunch of QoL changes as well as insulate them further from Wizards.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did they say that? As I remember it, their statement was basically "We feel confident that we could take this to a court of law". However, there's no reason not to future-proof against a company that has tried to screw you over. Give them no angle of attack. But this is the statement I'm looking at, maybe you are talking about a different one?</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://paizo.com/community/blog/v5748dyo6si7v?Paizo-Announces-SystemNeutral-Open-RPG-License[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justice and Rule, post: 9011741, member: 6778210"] Again, do you have any actual proof that they knew they were going to do this at the time? You keep dismissing the idea that the OGL situation ended up speeding this up, but you really don't have any proof of that. If you have some, I'd love to see it. I'm open to being convinced. I suppose my confusion here is that you're acting like this is some sort of betrayal, but they've been doing this sort of thing for a while. New printings of the PF2 Core Rulebook have had updated errata, with one class getting particular work. If you want to complain that they are making rulebooks "useless" by changing them, you're a little late for that debate. My rulebook does not have the most up-to-date errata for the Alchemist, so did they screw me, too? That last point is, I think, the biggest thing here: they've been doing updates, which is something that Wizards hasn't done. I think you can argue either strategy being better, but at the end it's something they've been doing for a while. Wanting to further remove the OGL stuff along with basically reedit the books into a smoother format (something which has been a rather widely-made critique of the original set) and I just don't see how this is "screwing" anyone. This is just comes off as taking a window they've been given to push through a bunch of QoL changes as well as insulate them further from Wizards. Did they say that? As I remember it, their statement was basically "We feel confident that we could take this to a court of law". However, there's no reason not to future-proof against a company that has tried to screw you over. Give them no angle of attack. But this is the statement I'm looking at, maybe you are talking about a different one? [URL unfurl="true"]https://paizo.com/community/blog/v5748dyo6si7v?Paizo-Announces-SystemNeutral-Open-RPG-License[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pathfinder To Get New Core Rulebooks Soon
Top