Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Pathfinder version terminology changes for the compilation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RangerWickett" data-source="post: 6222457" data-attributes="member: 63"><p>So we're probably going to tweak some terms and mechanics for the PF version.</p><p></p><p>1. Those who in 4e are devas are currently aasimar in PF. In the compilation, we'll make them <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/races/other-races/uncommon-races/arg-samsaran" target="_blank">samsarans</a>, but we're going to call them . . . devas.</p><p></p><p>The reasoning here is that in the setting, they clearly are a race that reincarnates, which fits Samsarans much better than Aasimar. And the reason I'm not eager to call them Samsarans is because, well, the setting has an eladrin goddess called Srasama, the name of which I kind of bastardized from the actual Hindu term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%E1%B9%83s%C4%81ra" target="_blank">samsara</a>. Then a few months later Paizo releases a race whose name is derived from the same word, but without the letters all rearranged.</p><p></p><p>So rather than having both 'samsaran' and 'srasama' in the same setting, I'd rather just call them devas.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>2. In 4e we have eladrin, whom we've called high elves in PF. The folks who in 4e are just elves, in PF are . . . well, we just call them elves, when we probably should have used 'wood elves.' This has led to some odd phrasing like, "She's a high elf disguised as an elf." </p><p></p><p>Since the eladrin from Elfaivar are a fairly distinct race who are in decline because nearly all their women died centuries ago, I feel like it's important to make them distinct from just normal elves. I'm thinking of using the Advanced Race Guide to make them 'fey' as opposed to 'humanoid,' and tweaking some of their abilities.</p><p></p><p>We could call them . . . I'm not quite sure. Maybe eladrins, maybe elfaivarans. They'd be basically elves, but with the fey type, without a Perception bonus or weapon familiarity, and with the ability to teleport 30 feet once per day as a move action.</p><p></p><p>Would this work for those of you who play PF? Would you be okay with races called devas and eladrin in Pathfinder? Or would it feel too much like 4e and turn you off?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RangerWickett, post: 6222457, member: 63"] So we're probably going to tweak some terms and mechanics for the PF version. 1. Those who in 4e are devas are currently aasimar in PF. In the compilation, we'll make them [URL="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/races/other-races/uncommon-races/arg-samsaran"]samsarans[/URL], but we're going to call them . . . devas. The reasoning here is that in the setting, they clearly are a race that reincarnates, which fits Samsarans much better than Aasimar. And the reason I'm not eager to call them Samsarans is because, well, the setting has an eladrin goddess called Srasama, the name of which I kind of bastardized from the actual Hindu term [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%E1%B9%83s%C4%81ra"]samsara[/URL]. Then a few months later Paizo releases a race whose name is derived from the same word, but without the letters all rearranged. So rather than having both 'samsaran' and 'srasama' in the same setting, I'd rather just call them devas. 2. In 4e we have eladrin, whom we've called high elves in PF. The folks who in 4e are just elves, in PF are . . . well, we just call them elves, when we probably should have used 'wood elves.' This has led to some odd phrasing like, "She's a high elf disguised as an elf." Since the eladrin from Elfaivar are a fairly distinct race who are in decline because nearly all their women died centuries ago, I feel like it's important to make them distinct from just normal elves. I'm thinking of using the Advanced Race Guide to make them 'fey' as opposed to 'humanoid,' and tweaking some of their abilities. We could call them . . . I'm not quite sure. Maybe eladrins, maybe elfaivarans. They'd be basically elves, but with the fey type, without a Perception bonus or weapon familiarity, and with the ability to teleport 30 feet once per day as a move action. Would this work for those of you who play PF? Would you be okay with races called devas and eladrin in Pathfinder? Or would it feel too much like 4e and turn you off? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Pathfinder version terminology changes for the compilation
Top