Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Pathfinder vs. 3.5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gothmog" data-source="post: 4322202" data-attributes="member: 317"><p>I really hadn't seen much about Pathfinder up until now, but I noticed quite a few people talking about it on ENWorld and saying some positive things about it, and that it fixed a lot of the issues of 3.5, so I figured I'd take a look.....</p><p></p><p>I thought 3e was rough to DM- I can't imagine running Pathfinder. The existing problems in 3e seem to have been magnified in Pathfinder, and casters would dominate even moreso than they do now in 3e. There are some cool ideas- the barbarian's alternative rage powers and the new cleric domains are both nice, but they are handled inelegantly and require a LOT of bookkeeping on the part of the player or (god forbid) the DM if he makes an NPC classed with levels.</p><p></p><p>For the most part, it looks like Paizo took all the things my group and I disliked about 3e (implied magic levels, rules interconnectedness, feats out the wazoo, magic item reliance, overpowered PCs, character building trumping actually playing the game, etc), and dialed them up to 11 (X-TREME RULEZ D&D!!!). Pathfinder is definitely a system for people who love system mastery and optomizing characters for the most effectiveness. For folks who love 3e, I guess thats a strength, but for me its a huge turn-off. Again, I don't know how Pathfinder would play, and I'd be willing to play a few sessions to see if it plays like it reads, but if it does, Paizo has lost all interest from me- which is a shame, because for the most part, I've really enjoyed what Paizo has done with their setting, the adventure paths, and the Classic Monsters Revised book.</p><p></p><p>It looks like Pathfinder tried to take some of 4e's ideas and shove them into 3.x, but its poorly executed and requires even MORE paperwork and prep time than 3.x!!! I know this is the Alpha release, and things likely will get changed some, but as it stands right now, I'd not consider Pathfinder a game I'd ever choose to play, let alone try to teach a new player. And without new blood coming in and expanding Pathfinder's fanbase, I can't see Paizo making this work long term.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gothmog, post: 4322202, member: 317"] I really hadn't seen much about Pathfinder up until now, but I noticed quite a few people talking about it on ENWorld and saying some positive things about it, and that it fixed a lot of the issues of 3.5, so I figured I'd take a look..... I thought 3e was rough to DM- I can't imagine running Pathfinder. The existing problems in 3e seem to have been magnified in Pathfinder, and casters would dominate even moreso than they do now in 3e. There are some cool ideas- the barbarian's alternative rage powers and the new cleric domains are both nice, but they are handled inelegantly and require a LOT of bookkeeping on the part of the player or (god forbid) the DM if he makes an NPC classed with levels. For the most part, it looks like Paizo took all the things my group and I disliked about 3e (implied magic levels, rules interconnectedness, feats out the wazoo, magic item reliance, overpowered PCs, character building trumping actually playing the game, etc), and dialed them up to 11 (X-TREME RULEZ D&D!!!). Pathfinder is definitely a system for people who love system mastery and optomizing characters for the most effectiveness. For folks who love 3e, I guess thats a strength, but for me its a huge turn-off. Again, I don't know how Pathfinder would play, and I'd be willing to play a few sessions to see if it plays like it reads, but if it does, Paizo has lost all interest from me- which is a shame, because for the most part, I've really enjoyed what Paizo has done with their setting, the adventure paths, and the Classic Monsters Revised book. It looks like Pathfinder tried to take some of 4e's ideas and shove them into 3.x, but its poorly executed and requires even MORE paperwork and prep time than 3.x!!! I know this is the Alpha release, and things likely will get changed some, but as it stands right now, I'd not consider Pathfinder a game I'd ever choose to play, let alone try to teach a new player. And without new blood coming in and expanding Pathfinder's fanbase, I can't see Paizo making this work long term. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Pathfinder vs. 3.5E?
Top