Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 4322221" data-attributes="member: 7635">My 2 cp.I have a 3.5 game I'm setting down for a while to play 4e. However, I've debated re-picking up said 3.5 game in Pathfinder down the road. However, I'm in the boat with a few of the other doubters; how much is change for change sake vs. legitimately fixing broken rules?My big concern (as others have pointed out) is mixing non-core 3.5 with pathfinder. Specifically, I worry about mixing some of these newly powered base classes with non-core feats, PrCs and the like to create even more uber PCs than either WotC had considered when making them or Paizo took into mind during the upgrade. In essence, the quality control on both sides falls off (WotC: PrC #344 isn't broken because a fighter can only have X feats, Paizo: Our fighters have Y feats, we never considered the ramification of this on PrC #344) so it falls to me (more so than now) to make sure things don't fall off the Abyss. While I do like a number of the overall fixes done (and I don't mind adding a bit to half-orcs, monks, fighters, and sorcerers) I am leery of the sheer power-escalation pathfinder grants and how that effects the multitude of 3.5 material I already use.(and to pre-answer the question: I don't consider much of my 3.0 compatible; I rarely use my 3.0 books since 3.5 came out).</blockquote>