Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Azgulor" data-source="post: 4916778" data-attributes="member: 14291">I don't agree with the premise that the AE races are more powerful.  If you factor in Racial Levels, yes, but the base races, no.For example: Littorans, Mohg, Sibbecai, & Verrick all recieve +2 / -2 to stats vs. PF's +2 / +2 / -2 spread.Giants, Dracha, and Faen present additional abilities and trade-offs based on their size/physiology.I believe bringing the AE classes up to PF power-level would be marginally easier than doing the same to 3.5.  The variation in power isn't that great from what I can see.  I've only used some AE classes in play rather than a full AE campaign so perhaps there's more of a power difference than I'm seeing.If you give races an extra +2 stat, use PF skill allocation, and fill in the occasional AE dead class level with a Bonus Feat, I'll think you'll be pretty close.  All of the AE classes seem fairly easy to Pathfinderize but I haven't done it yet.As a point of comparison, however, I think Adamant's Tome of Secrets Swashbuckler is superior to AE's Unfettered.  Wizard & Magister don't seem to be that far apart at first glance.</blockquote>