Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Odysseus" data-source="post: 4135585" data-attributes="member: 8615">For my in person groups role-playing needs. I need something fairly plug and play , and something everyone at the table can get a copy of the rules. 4E may not quite fit that, although everybody can get a copy of the rules. wizards core setting  isn't that appealing, so published adventures also may not be appealing. And if 3rd parties arn't producing adventures 4E isn't really playable.While with 3.5 I have issues with rules wise I can still play. And there are plenty of adventures out there already published I can buy. Plus with Pazio commitment to pathfinder I get a continued supply of adventures.My online role-playing has different needs, and how well the digital tabletop works out probably has a lot to do with my long term commitment to 4E.So I believe Pazio choice with backwards compatibility is exactly right for me. I need a rule set that works with 3rd edition rules. My only complaint so far is I think they are adding to much, rather than trying to make the rules lighter.</blockquote>