Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Paul S. Kemp's defense of shared world fiction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JLowder" data-source="post: 5106272" data-attributes="member: 28003"><p>Passion is indeed important to any writer, and any process that puts artificial constraints on what or how a writer creates can be deadening.</p><p></p><p>However, you are assuming you can see into someone else's heart, their creative soul. You can't. People write for different motivations and readers or even other writers or editors have no foolproof way to tell if someone is writing one of those seeming "labor of love" novels because he or she hopes to be famous or rich or to score with someone who digs the artistic type or some other non-aesthetic reason. And without being privy to the editorial process, you don't know what changes were made to any work on its way to the bookstore--or why those changes were made.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, some "shared world" books are put together in precisely the liberated fashion you describe. The first draft of <em>The Crystal Shard</em>, for example, was written without a contract or deadline and submitted blind, unsolicited, to TSR. The pitches for the original Harpers books involved writers telling TSR "This is the book I want to write, and here are some chapters and the plot" with no input or promise of contract or pay.</p><p></p><p>It's also not accurate to equate the presence of pay with a lack of passion. They are not mutually exclusive. Someone can work in publishing because she or he loves the work and, coincidentally, be lucky enough to get paid for that, just as a doctor can be passionate about medicine and get paid for that pursuit.</p><p></p><p>In fact, let me note that pay in publishing overall is miserable. The average advance for a shared-world novel is, say, $5,000; a fair number of books do not earn over that advance. If you break that down per hour of work required to write the typical 90,000 to 100,000 words, you'll find that your annual salary will likely make you eligible for government cheese. Most writers, even of shared world books, do not write full time. They write in their spare time, usually because they love to write.</p><p></p><p>All that said, there are aspects to shared world projects (contracts, editorial control, etc) that can be anti-creative, and these production issues are what contribute to the high number of mediocre titles in some shared world lines. Some writers can successfully negotiate these minefields and create the books they want to create. Others cannot.</p><p></p><p>But, in the end, it's a mistake to assume that you can tell something about a writer's motivation--whether he or she is writing for a paycheck or to tell a story--by the fashion in which a work is published.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>James Lowder</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JLowder, post: 5106272, member: 28003"] Passion is indeed important to any writer, and any process that puts artificial constraints on what or how a writer creates can be deadening. However, you are assuming you can see into someone else's heart, their creative soul. You can't. People write for different motivations and readers or even other writers or editors have no foolproof way to tell if someone is writing one of those seeming "labor of love" novels because he or she hopes to be famous or rich or to score with someone who digs the artistic type or some other non-aesthetic reason. And without being privy to the editorial process, you don't know what changes were made to any work on its way to the bookstore--or why those changes were made. Similarly, some "shared world" books are put together in precisely the liberated fashion you describe. The first draft of [i]The Crystal Shard[/i], for example, was written without a contract or deadline and submitted blind, unsolicited, to TSR. The pitches for the original Harpers books involved writers telling TSR "This is the book I want to write, and here are some chapters and the plot" with no input or promise of contract or pay. It's also not accurate to equate the presence of pay with a lack of passion. They are not mutually exclusive. Someone can work in publishing because she or he loves the work and, coincidentally, be lucky enough to get paid for that, just as a doctor can be passionate about medicine and get paid for that pursuit. In fact, let me note that pay in publishing overall is miserable. The average advance for a shared-world novel is, say, $5,000; a fair number of books do not earn over that advance. If you break that down per hour of work required to write the typical 90,000 to 100,000 words, you'll find that your annual salary will likely make you eligible for government cheese. Most writers, even of shared world books, do not write full time. They write in their spare time, usually because they love to write. All that said, there are aspects to shared world projects (contracts, editorial control, etc) that can be anti-creative, and these production issues are what contribute to the high number of mediocre titles in some shared world lines. Some writers can successfully negotiate these minefields and create the books they want to create. Others cannot. But, in the end, it's a mistake to assume that you can tell something about a writer's motivation--whether he or she is writing for a paycheck or to tell a story--by the fashion in which a work is published. Cheers, James Lowder [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Paul S. Kemp's defense of shared world fiction
Top