Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tom Cashel" data-source="post: 167604" data-attributes="member: 321">Umbran, you're the man.Bronn:Picture it this way--the D&amp;D Cosmos like a big scale.&nbsp; Every time someone does good (or casts a &quot;good&quot; spell) the balance tips one way, and every time &quot;evil&quot; is done, it tips the other way.&nbsp; Doing evil affects the cosmos, and thus affects your aura.I wouldn't worry too much about it; you'll only end up Neutral, which is how Bronn acts, anyway.&nbsp; Think of the freedom! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Re: Ruathgrym vs. Nightscale.&nbsp; Yes, it's a good act.&nbsp; But Ruathgrym would have to cast that spell a HELL of a lot of times to become good, let me tell you.&nbsp; You, on the other hand, are much closer to neutrality than the Corpsecoil is to being good.And it's not according to MY rules, it's the way the alignment system is set up.&nbsp; Like you said, Bronn likes it good or evil, black or white.&nbsp; That's what it is...one or the other.&nbsp; There is no gray area in D&amp;D where the summoning of evil to do good comes out as a &quot;good&quot; act.Unless you're Neutral.&nbsp; Which is why my favorite wizard ever was True Neutral.&nbsp; Yeah, he wanted to do good.&nbsp; But he also wanted lots of spells and power.&nbsp; He had friends, and he would defend them to the death.&nbsp; But he was also a really crafty, underhanded bastard to his enemies.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tom Cashel, post: 167604, member: 321"] Umbran, you're the man. Bronn: Picture it this way--the D&D Cosmos like a big scale. Every time someone does good (or casts a "good" spell) the balance tips one way, and every time "evil" is done, it tips the other way. Doing evil affects the cosmos, and thus affects your aura. I wouldn't worry too much about it; you'll only end up Neutral, which is how Bronn acts, anyway. Think of the freedom! :) Re: Ruathgrym vs. Nightscale. Yes, it's a good act. But Ruathgrym would have to cast that spell a HELL of a lot of times to become good, let me tell you. You, on the other hand, are much closer to neutrality than the Corpsecoil is to being good. And it's not according to MY rules, it's the way the alignment system is set up. Like you said, Bronn likes it good or evil, black or white. That's what it is...one or the other. There is no gray area in D&D where the summoning of evil to do good comes out as a "good" act. Unless you're Neutral. Which is why my favorite wizard ever was True Neutral. Yeah, he wanted to do good. But he also wanted lots of spells and power. He had friends, and he would defend them to the death. But he was also a really crafty, underhanded bastard to his enemies. [/QUOTE]

Verification