Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
PC creation freedom and campaign setting fit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8191145" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>I think the title and wording of option 4 are strange. My impression was that you were going for an option where the players choose from a DM-curated set of options and individual exceptions are not made for the PCs. But the way you worded it sounds like the opposite of that.</p><p></p><p>At any rate, I primarily DM (though I enjoy playing as well) and I prefer option 3. I like to curate player options to those that are thematically appropriate for the setting and campaign, but I try to provide enough options that players can have some variety between their characters, and I’m willing to work with players to create custom options.</p><p></p><p>For example, I just had session 0 for my next campaign last week; race options were PHB and Volo’s Guide, with some modifications (for example, Yuan-ti Pureblood getting poison resistance instead of immunity and no magic resistance). One of my players really wanted to play a Kalashtar, so I pointed out that they’re kind of an Eberron-specific thing, but asked what it was about them that appealed so much. She explained that she liked the idea of having a symbiotic relationship with a mysterious entity from another plane, so I suggested she use the Kalashtar racial features, but be a regular human who had formed a similar sort of bond with a ghost. That satisfied what she wanted out of Kalashtar, without me having to alter the setting to make it fit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8191145, member: 6779196"] I think the title and wording of option 4 are strange. My impression was that you were going for an option where the players choose from a DM-curated set of options and individual exceptions are not made for the PCs. But the way you worded it sounds like the opposite of that. At any rate, I primarily DM (though I enjoy playing as well) and I prefer option 3. I like to curate player options to those that are thematically appropriate for the setting and campaign, but I try to provide enough options that players can have some variety between their characters, and I’m willing to work with players to create custom options. For example, I just had session 0 for my next campaign last week; race options were PHB and Volo’s Guide, with some modifications (for example, Yuan-ti Pureblood getting poison resistance instead of immunity and no magic resistance). One of my players really wanted to play a Kalashtar, so I pointed out that they’re kind of an Eberron-specific thing, but asked what it was about them that appealed so much. She explained that she liked the idea of having a symbiotic relationship with a mysterious entity from another plane, so I suggested she use the Kalashtar racial features, but be a regular human who had formed a similar sort of bond with a ghost. That satisfied what she wanted out of Kalashtar, without me having to alter the setting to make it fit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
PC creation freedom and campaign setting fit
Top