Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PC discussing strategy while in melee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shadowthorn" data-source="post: 348480" data-attributes="member: 1532"><p><strong>kreynolds</strong>: The rule works much better in practice than it appears to in theory. If the players are aware of the combat environment, the miniatures are all set up, they know their attack bonuses & damage, then six seconds is plenty of time to say, "I attack the orc in front of me". Roll the dice, on to the next fella. The rule is not set in concrete; sometimes situations come up that need clarification, and they are discussed - briefly.</p><p></p><p>As you set up the combat, jot down the init order, arrange the minis, each player is taking those couple of minutes to decide what to do, so they really have more than six seconds. While the first player describes their action, the second player is using that time to plan; thus player two gets six seconds to think while player one is reacting, plus his own six seconds. Player three gets 18 seconds; player four gets 24. Does that make sense?</p><p></p><p>Again, it may sound draconian in principle (and my group at the time raised their eyebrows when I announced the rule), but if you try it, you might be surprised. My group never had any problems with it, and very few players ever lost an action because they ran out of time or couldn't decide what to do.</p><p></p><p>I suppose we can assume that the PCs are all combat geniuses, and that the players are thus entitled to discuss strategy & tactics ad infinitum while in combat, but I enjoy the "adrenaline" effect of eliminating that chatter while the battle rages.</p><p></p><p>Each gaming group is different; what works for one may not work for another.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shadowthorn, post: 348480, member: 1532"] [B]kreynolds[/B]: The rule works much better in practice than it appears to in theory. If the players are aware of the combat environment, the miniatures are all set up, they know their attack bonuses & damage, then six seconds is plenty of time to say, "I attack the orc in front of me". Roll the dice, on to the next fella. The rule is not set in concrete; sometimes situations come up that need clarification, and they are discussed - briefly. As you set up the combat, jot down the init order, arrange the minis, each player is taking those couple of minutes to decide what to do, so they really have more than six seconds. While the first player describes their action, the second player is using that time to plan; thus player two gets six seconds to think while player one is reacting, plus his own six seconds. Player three gets 18 seconds; player four gets 24. Does that make sense? Again, it may sound draconian in principle (and my group at the time raised their eyebrows when I announced the rule), but if you try it, you might be surprised. My group never had any problems with it, and very few players ever lost an action because they ran out of time or couldn't decide what to do. I suppose we can assume that the PCs are all combat geniuses, and that the players are thus entitled to discuss strategy & tactics ad infinitum while in combat, but I enjoy the "adrenaline" effect of eliminating that chatter while the battle rages. Each gaming group is different; what works for one may not work for another. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PC discussing strategy while in melee
Top