Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PC Lifeplanner Spreadsheet - damage/defense statistics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Splart" data-source="post: 4399248" data-attributes="member: 12316"><p>One of the limitations of the spreadsheet is that it cannot account for changing attacks during the career of a PC. To keep a reasonable level of complexity, it assumes you use the same attack from level 1 to 30. For the case of the rogue multi-classed into ranger, for levels 1-10, a different column has to be used. The same is true for the ranger. Until level 11 when he becomes a Stormwarden and gets Scimitar Dance, he is better off using his bow than meleeing. That's why I have two ranger columns. The longbow ranger is for 1-10 and the scimitar ranger is for 11+.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All of the special attacks, Quarry, Lock Curse, and Sneak Attack are called "Quarry" for simplicity in the spreadsheet.</p><p></p><p>The next version of the spreadsheet will allow a modifier to Sneak Attack damage, to show that it's not a sure thing. On the other hand, I find that because of the heavy damage rogues do when flanking, if partnered with a marking fighter, they often give the fighter free attacks. It's not exact, but it does account for some additional damage when the rogue does have CA.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmm. You're right. In a literal duel riposte would be a big factor. I don't think of it as an actual duel. It's just a metaphor to show how good offense is compared to defense.</p><p></p><p>As Loisel already showed with his spreadsheet, even brutal scoundrel, riposte strike, and a rapier does less damage than a ranger. Since the rogue/ranger does nearly as much damage as the ranger Stormwarden, but with a much better AC, it's clearly the better path. Once Twin Strike is available, Riposte Strike is irrelevant. In order to do a melee Twin Strike, the rogue MUST wield two weapons and use Str as his modifier. This means no shield and probably not enough stats left after maximizing Str and Dex for Con to get Hide Armor or Spec Hide feats. That's 4 points of AC (large shield 2, shield spec 1, hide spec 1) lost at 30, which will kill the rogue's Gives to Gets ratio, or damage inflicted to suffered ratio. A Str bonus to Sneak Attack comes nowhere near making up for it.</p><p></p><p>--Splart</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Splart, post: 4399248, member: 12316"] One of the limitations of the spreadsheet is that it cannot account for changing attacks during the career of a PC. To keep a reasonable level of complexity, it assumes you use the same attack from level 1 to 30. For the case of the rogue multi-classed into ranger, for levels 1-10, a different column has to be used. The same is true for the ranger. Until level 11 when he becomes a Stormwarden and gets Scimitar Dance, he is better off using his bow than meleeing. That's why I have two ranger columns. The longbow ranger is for 1-10 and the scimitar ranger is for 11+. All of the special attacks, Quarry, Lock Curse, and Sneak Attack are called "Quarry" for simplicity in the spreadsheet. The next version of the spreadsheet will allow a modifier to Sneak Attack damage, to show that it's not a sure thing. On the other hand, I find that because of the heavy damage rogues do when flanking, if partnered with a marking fighter, they often give the fighter free attacks. It's not exact, but it does account for some additional damage when the rogue does have CA. Hmm. You're right. In a literal duel riposte would be a big factor. I don't think of it as an actual duel. It's just a metaphor to show how good offense is compared to defense. As Loisel already showed with his spreadsheet, even brutal scoundrel, riposte strike, and a rapier does less damage than a ranger. Since the rogue/ranger does nearly as much damage as the ranger Stormwarden, but with a much better AC, it's clearly the better path. Once Twin Strike is available, Riposte Strike is irrelevant. In order to do a melee Twin Strike, the rogue MUST wield two weapons and use Str as his modifier. This means no shield and probably not enough stats left after maximizing Str and Dex for Con to get Hide Armor or Spec Hide feats. That's 4 points of AC (large shield 2, shield spec 1, hide spec 1) lost at 30, which will kill the rogue's Gives to Gets ratio, or damage inflicted to suffered ratio. A Str bonus to Sneak Attack comes nowhere near making up for it. --Splart [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PC Lifeplanner Spreadsheet - damage/defense statistics
Top