Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gamerprinter" data-source="post: 5768595" data-attributes="member: 50895">The first year we played Pathfinder, there were lots of elements of 3.5 we brought (converted) to our PF game, and when we were playing 3.5, we incorporated elements of PF. Now, we don't touch 3.5 with a 10' pole. There is more than enough variety, covering a variety rules (and since I do allow 3pp Pathfinder material, the variety is increased multi-fold.) Today, 3.5 is just a memory  Paizo developers stated that some of the later classes in 3.5 were much more powerful than the 3.5 core classes. So Paizo chose to up the power of their core classes those more powerful 3.5 classes. If you limit yourself to PF Core, you might be satisfied with it alone. It sounds like however, because of your interest to use your 3.5 material, that you want more variety. By the time you (if you do) purchase the APG, UM, and UC, you might find the variety available there lessens the need for 3.5 legacy stuff. If you're like me and allow 3pp Pathfinder material then definitely 3.5 belongs on a shelf to look at and not play. But we all have different preferences, and no style of playing is wrong, so there's no telling which you would prefer. In my experience of playing PF, my feelings of this has changed over time, and might change for you too.</blockquote>