Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
PCGen 5.11.12 beta released
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thpr" data-source="post: 3440445" data-attributes="member: 48911"><p>Not necessarily. You're making the issue very black and white... though perhaps one should interpret it simply as drama, rather than a literal statement. Your past responses here on ENWorld don't imply a "keystroke-by-keystroke description is required" level of stupidity. Lack of interest in learning, perhaps, but that's "want directions" not "need directions".</p><p></p><p>To be precise, you *have* been critical of PCGen in at least three other threads (Looking for a simpler PC Gen..., On the State of Digital Aids for D+D/D20/OGL and CMP: On its way out?). Churlish, as you put it, if my memory serves.</p><p></p><p>You have given us feedback, and you have been rather clear that you are not a programmer and editing LST files is not something you are interested in. So be it. I'm okay with that. I do care about improving PCGen, I believe we are making progress improving PCGen (even if occasionally slow, since it is personal-time volunteer work) and I do have a thick enough skin to take criticism (although it's far more likely to get action if it's constructive). </p><p></p><p>What I'm enormously disappointed about is that I have:</p><p>(1) Previously asked whether you would be willing to help be an alpha tester of a GUI based editor for PCGen when it is available</p><p>and now</p><p>(2) Specifically responded to your questions to the best of my ability with respect to the pathway from our current system to a new GUI editor</p><p></p><p>The response I get from you is *DEAD SILENCE*. I'm not sure it rises to rude, but I *WILL* say I'm disappointed. Your behavior implies that you are not willing to spend *any* time, even if it includes things you *can* do for PCGen... like testing of new components when we release them... or simply saying "Thanks" when we provide an honest assessment and update of where we are.</p><p></p><p>So, please, help me understand. Given the lack of response from you, I get the impression the investment of my time is not valuable to you. Is that the correct interpretation? Should I be spending my time elsewhere instead of interacting with the PCGen community to help them understand our choices and priorities?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thpr, post: 3440445, member: 48911"] Not necessarily. You're making the issue very black and white... though perhaps one should interpret it simply as drama, rather than a literal statement. Your past responses here on ENWorld don't imply a "keystroke-by-keystroke description is required" level of stupidity. Lack of interest in learning, perhaps, but that's "want directions" not "need directions". To be precise, you *have* been critical of PCGen in at least three other threads (Looking for a simpler PC Gen..., On the State of Digital Aids for D+D/D20/OGL and CMP: On its way out?). Churlish, as you put it, if my memory serves. You have given us feedback, and you have been rather clear that you are not a programmer and editing LST files is not something you are interested in. So be it. I'm okay with that. I do care about improving PCGen, I believe we are making progress improving PCGen (even if occasionally slow, since it is personal-time volunteer work) and I do have a thick enough skin to take criticism (although it's far more likely to get action if it's constructive). What I'm enormously disappointed about is that I have: (1) Previously asked whether you would be willing to help be an alpha tester of a GUI based editor for PCGen when it is available and now (2) Specifically responded to your questions to the best of my ability with respect to the pathway from our current system to a new GUI editor The response I get from you is *DEAD SILENCE*. I'm not sure it rises to rude, but I *WILL* say I'm disappointed. Your behavior implies that you are not willing to spend *any* time, even if it includes things you *can* do for PCGen... like testing of new components when we release them... or simply saying "Thanks" when we provide an honest assessment and update of where we are. So, please, help me understand. Given the lack of response from you, I get the impression the investment of my time is not valuable to you. Is that the correct interpretation? Should I be spending my time elsewhere instead of interacting with the PCGen community to help them understand our choices and priorities? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
PCGen 5.11.12 beta released
Top